Indie? I would consider Resogun AAA.

And there are tons of games self published on ps4 and x1.
Dude what's wrong with you.

What games dont even deserve to be mentioned because ooh ooh they have no publisher so they are forbidden?

Obviously self publishing is possible on WiiU, if Shinen published themself their 3DS and WiiU-games (in the DS-era they always had other publishers) and Unepic is published from the single person who developed the game.

And ZombiU is no new IP in any case:

https://archive.org/details/msdos_Zombi_1990

'Mario Golf' relies on the mario brand to sell the game.

An IP isnt limited to gameplay, it's characters, story, world, features etc.

1. Intellectual property (IP) refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions; literary and artistic works; designs; and symbols, names and images used in commerce.

Really? Ico and SOTC weren't 'spiritual sequels'

The two games give two different 'experiences' IMO, but then I guess that's down to opinion

"Resogun (stylized as RESOGUN) is a 2013 voxel-based side-scrolling shoot 'em up video game developed by Finnish indie developer Housemarque"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resogun

Why do you attack me? (What's wrong with you) I said that titles likes Nano Assault Neo or Unepic probably would end up as published by the platform holder on other platforms but it seems Nintendo makes eShop-publishing especially easy. It therefore is a bit random if one Indie chooses to publish themself while another chooses to take the publishing umbrella of the platform holder. Kitler pointed out the same thing.

I don't say these games shouldn't be mentioned, but this randomness let's me take tthis list with a lot more salt.

If it is that easy, then the reliance on new IPs in gaming is completely worthless. I can release the exact same game but rename the game and rename the characters and it is a new IP. I can make a completely new game, with new gameplay, new controls, new technology, new customer group but if I take the hero from another game and it instantly is an old IP. I'm interesting in playing new games, not in old games with new branding.

So the fact Housemarque is an indie studio because they do not operate under a publisher, their title (Owned by Sony, published by Sony) shouldn't be included?

The point of this thread is to show the willingness of the three publishers to bring new ip's to the market.

Resogun and Ori are perfect examples of that.

Would've could've should've didn't. There are loads of new IP's on PS4 that I didn't count because Sony didn't publish them, from studios with publishers and those devilish studios without:
Watch_dogs
Hellsblade
Shadow of Mordor (Kind of)
Destiny
Volume & N++ (Self Published)

So there's absolutely no bias. Indies are extremely important to the list and if a studio who isnt owned by a publisher makes a game, it's deserving of being included. But if nintendo worked with the indies (i.e. funded development for publishing rights) like wonderful 101 then it was included.

And also unepic wouldnt have counted anyway because it was on PC first.

Luckily thats never happened then. A game being reskinned and renamed. Unless you can find one of them in my list then i'll gladly take it off.

That happens all the time. Take alone the clones of successful games.

But well, I shouldn't discuss. You have choosen some arbitrary rules and stick to them. That makes the list without any real significance and discussion will only end ugly. So bye.

Oh wow, I didn't expect MS or Sony to have that many new IPs.