By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - So it would appear Bayonetta 2 has flopped. We need to talk about it.

 

Which games do you prefer from Nintendo?

Old school games such as ... 187 29.78%
 
New mature games such as ... 214 34.08%
 
Yo Mama 225 35.83%
 
Total:626

If Bayo 2 sold 500k, that would be pretty amazing, considering. The very moment I saw that game announced for Wii U(and even if it was to be a muliplat) I thought flop, or at least wont sell well. It's not like Platinum games are megasellers as well.

Not sure what is there to talk about really. Bayo 2 is a niche game that is pretty much a mid-teir game(in a go big or go home era) on a platform that isn't selling well,

Are people still on a "They took our games!!" thing though? I've seen quite a number of people wanting it to fail. On Youtube, but yeah that's Youtube, oh yeah and on Gaf there were bannings iirc because people were seeing red. What was the response on here?



Around the Network

Random Nintendo thread somewhere in the depth of internet:



spemanig said:
Nem said:

What makes a game "next-gen" then? AcUnity for example struggles to keep 30fps.  You may say Bayo2 isnt next gen, but i dont see these "next-gen" games you talk about. They are a dream. Bayo 2 is here, it looks amazing and it plays amazing. I dont know how that can be anything less than an advancement.

We are going a bit off-topic here though. :P


AC Unity is a bad next gen game. Bayo2 is a great game that is only "next gen" in catagory. It's not next gen in features. Galaxy is also good and plays amazing. Does that make it next gen? No. That makes it good. 


Yes, but what makes a game "next-gen"? Because its not something thats easy to tell apart anymore.



Nem said:
spemanig said:
Nem said:

What makes a game "next-gen" then? AcUnity for example struggles to keep 30fps.  You may say Bayo2 isnt next gen, but i dont see these "next-gen" games you talk about. They are a dream. Bayo 2 is here, it looks amazing and it plays amazing. I dont know how that can be anything less than an advancement.

We are going a bit off-topic here though. :P


AC Unity is a bad next gen game. Bayo2 is a great game that is only "next gen" in catagory. It's not next gen in features. Galaxy is also good and plays amazing. Does that make it next gen? No. That makes it good. 


Yes, but what makes a game "next-gen"? Because its not something thats easy to tell apart anymore.


What makes a game next-gen?  Well going by this gens definition, it's, remastering last gen games with better graphics, or making the same games as last gen, calling them something different, add a gimmick or twist and sprinkling better graphics on top.



Reasons:

1. 3rd Part

2. Action game

3. Nintendo Console

4. M rating

Fully expected it to do what it did. Who didn't?



PC GAMING: BEST GAMES. WORST CONTROLS

A mouse & keyboard are made for sending email and typing internet badassery. Not for playing video games!!!

Around the Network
captain carot said:
Random Nintendo thread somewhere in the depth of internet:

Another year without cable, another year without an all-day marathon of Groundhog Day

(personal aside. carry on)



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

UltimateUnknown said:

I don't see these thread titles anymore, so I decided to bring it back.

In any case, Bayo 2 seems to have sold about half a million from the VGC database, which isn't really that good for a title that had Nintendo's backing. It doesn't even appear as though Bayo 2 will even hit a million lifetime.

We already know Wii U has a small install base and Bayo 2 is a niche game. So let's focus on some other aspects:

What does this mean about the future of Bayonetta? Does this title prove the age old assumption of many people that Nintendo consoles will only sell old school Nintendo games such as Mario and Zelda? Can we still blame 3rd parties for not bringing mature games to Wii U when Nintendo themselves couldn't sell Bayo 2, a very mature title to their audience? Should Nintendo just focus on making more old school games and give up on a new mature venture?

Let's discuss.

Where's the "all of them" choice? I get what interests me.

How did one mature second party game sales in one genre, reflect all third party games coming to the Wii U. It likely had nothing to do with it at all, but came about from some people that wants to push that directive. The game could have sold 1:1 with the Wii U and it would still not change any third party support for the system. It's absurd.

Of course many people are going to buy Mario and Zelda games. That goes without question, they are generally very good if not great. If those games went to another system they would sell there as well, that is the same reason we keep seeing 'Nintendo should go third party' threads every week or two. Just because Mario and Zelda games sell doesn't mean that others wont.

Pikmin 3 according to VGchartz has only sold 860000 copies, Captain Toad has only sold 200000 and they are both made by Nintendo and thus had Nintendo's backing. Some games are going to sell well, others likely aren't. Bayo 2 has actually sold quite well for the kind of game it is. Being in the same genre as Ninja Gaiden, God of War and Devil May Cry among others. None of these have proven to be bombastic sellers. DMC is around 3 million on a system with 150 million sales... GOW has done better than that, or any others of these listed but it's still not super amazing, actually it sits around the same attachment rate in ratio with the consoles sold as the PS3 (4.5ish million to 80 million 5.6%) to the Wii U (490000 to 8.5 million 5.7%). Ninja Gaiden has never sold very well, roughly the same as the first Bayonetta. I'm not even going to touch profits or anything like that because I, likely none of us, really have any clue how much each game has cost to make or how much they have needed to be profitabe and with that successful or to be considered a flop.

If Bayo2 is a flop (hasn't made it's money back that it cost to develop it) it's on Nintendo as it was a second party. Platinum got paid either way, Nintendo funded the game so sales would be more for Nintendo than Platinum. I wouldn't be too surprised if it was a fairly small team that worked on the game as Platinum has been working on at least 3 other games in the mean time. Platinum is still around and must have made profits from their other games, none of which have sold stellar, so you can infer what you want from that.

I certainly don't think that Nintendo should give up on expanding their library and with that 'mature' games. It's undeniable that they have a stigma that goes against them on this front. Admittedly, it's rather funny that they do since the Wii U released with more 'mature' games than any other console... but whatever. There is a large slice of the pie that will only go after 'mature' games for one reason or another, it would not make sense for them to ignore that and shrink their potential market instead of attempting to expand it. This should be said for every console maker really though. That's like saying that MS and Sony shouldn't make or release games that are 'family friendly' on their respective consoles. That actually means that LittleBigPlanet, Kinect Adventures should never have been made as they're family friendly, they have actually sold more than any of the aforementioned games each. Oddly enough, Kinect Adventures is the best selling game for the 360.



Gotta figure out how to set these up lol.

PRrussiaGC said:
Clyde32 said:

140k is $8.4 million. Overall the game sold 1.5 million which brings it to about $90M. This is a definite profit. I'm very certain it costs less than $8 million to port a game from the 360 to the wii u.

 

Sonic Boom suffers from bad word of mouth. They were lucky to make it this far. But if they sell 400K they will make a profit. Sonic Boom was bound to flop the moment the reviews came in. It is lucky to make it this far. Using it in an argument will get you nowhere.


I think Sonic Boom is like......It sells because of how mediocre it is, Sonic 06 was horrible and so was Shadow The Hedgehog, and both games brought around 2 million units sold? Don't remember right now. And with Groups like ProJared and Gamegrumps making fun of it, I wouldn't be suprised if them playing the game brought some profit. 


Yes, Sonic 06 did sell like that, but it wasn't frontloaded. You need to understand that not all games are frontloaded. 



Why do people suggest this game flopped.  As far as i can see it looks like it will at the very least beat out lifetime bayonetta 1 sales on 360 and quite possibly surpass even the sales of bayonetta 1 on ps3 and it's massive install base.  This game is over performing on any realistic expectations.



DerNebel said:
Samus Aran said:
DerNebel said:

I was wrong, it was 95k at the end of November

http://neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=143031325&postcount=6822

Supposed leaks aren't trustworthy sources. I hope you don't study history lol! Critical thinking is important.

Wait till real numbers before you judge.

Oh now we're doing this shit again, if the people in NPD thread on Neogaf believe it and if none of the other leakes come to dispute the numbers than we can assume that they are correct.


But the people on the Gaf thread also believed the 10k gap 'leak'...