I hardly think that the people that like to pre-order games are the only ones at fault here if the publisher are deceptive enough to do these kinds of things. Yes, the consumer has some fault for not waiting long in order to see the full reviews of the games but it is still Ubisoft's terrible practice non the less which shouldn't go un-noticed

And yes, I am well aware of his full opinion I never said the whole game was bad nor should people not play it but I did say however that the stuttering was an issue which remains to be correct. Its not like Ubisoft didn't test these things on monster rigs and I am pretty sure the developers knew that the stuttering will be an issue with the game cause they have gaming rigs to test them on and regardless of what the limitation might be, the point of optomizing a game is to make sure they can work with the limitations and not just try to brute-force everything and stuttering is a noticable issue... You should also check out his full review on Far Cry 4 which goes into even more detail about his findings as to what the stuttering might be, its quite interesting

Also, they released 5 AAA games this year, (I believe) Far Cry 4, Asscreed Unity, The Crew, Asscreed Rogue and Watch_Dogs... Out of the 5, 3 of them had issues of some sort. Whether they be dissappointing/downgrading/poorly optomized/filled with bugs and etc, they all come from one publisher. Heck, they have been a huge problem in the past when it comes to PC games in general and this year, they are by far, the worst developer/publisher imo. And I really don't understand why people continue to defend such clearly terrible practices. Yes, other companies sometimes do the same and when they do, they won't go unnoticed either just like how Ubisoft shouldn't

Lol

no wonder they didn't send out review copies

They released a game that had tons of frame rate issues across all platforms and it was filled with bugs and glitches... How much worse can you get from an AAA developer/publisher? And the only reason they did that was to get more guaranteed sales for their other titles since they make $36 for every $60 retail game and doing giving out digital games for $30 should make them even more money. If anything, it was a greedy tactic masked to look like it was something nice

Again, it just adds to the issues and lets not forget that the PC version had the original e3 assets inside the game files which modders found out and simply enabled them which is a rather curious and an odd case since most people that enabled the mods, including TB said that the performance hit with the original e3 textures were minimal even though Ubisoft claimed that the reason why those textures weren't enabled to begin with was due to a large performance hit. Oh and from what I heard, the game was fairly disappointing from a story and even gameplay prespective but thats subjective

I guess this is not good. ^^

You do realise that, thats why companies put a review embargo on their reviews right? If you watch TB or Jim Sterling, they talk about it all the time... Essentially, the good developers/publishers would give out the review copies 1 month - 2 weeks before the game launches and give all reviewers an embargo of 3 weeks - 1 week, that way, all reviewers have 1 week to play the game at minimum and review it and when the embargo lifts, all reviewers can publish their reviews at the sametime which effectively elimates that "first come first serve" factor. And if you break the embargo, all future review copies from various publishers will not be sent to you...

Not surprising; the beta was horrible.

Won't be getting that then. Doh.

Purchasing a turd goes under a consumers responsibility, NOT the publishers ... 

Customers aren't anywhere near gullible as you think they are so the fault lies with them, NOT Ubisoft ...

Final time I am going to address this ...

Your overblowing the whole stuttering issue ... That only occurs when you try to traverse the world at a high speed. Like he said, "not too shabby" ...

Ubisoft has always held a negative interaction with PC gaming so why exactly are they just heavily damned for it now and not before on the internet ? No one's really defending Ubisoft, I'm just tired of the hate bandwagon against them going on here ... 

Haha... the rule remains true. If they dont ship review copies, its because they know they have a turd.

Bold: If the publisher doesn't release enough info for the consumer, I would say its the fault of both and I do think they are fairly gullible considering how many terrible games get sold each year

italic: Again, I never said the game itself is bad, all I said was that. And TB did say that "Your traveling fast, your frame rate is gonna hitch, over and over again, it consistently happens, it even happened just there as I was moving fairly normally, just sprinting around the place" 11:50. And its not like Far Cry 4 is a small game, the game is huge and you are gonna have to use cars and things a lot in order to get around. Again, as I said, the game is awesome in every way but this is certainly noticable. The port is overall great and the graphics do look pretty but the stuttering is still an issue

Underlined: If you are tired of the hate bandwagon, do what everyone else does and just ignore the posts and threads... Not very hard

Edit: Okay, underlining does not work for some reason