Patience is a virtue that not everyone has and there are many new gamers being made everyday who don't know how the gaming industry works or how explotive they can be so that "broken trust" that many gamers had between the publishers and themselves might not be there yet for many consumersl. Oh and obviously its a subjective thing but generally, if a game is bad from many reviewers, its probably bad for the majority of the players

Well, the issue is the consistant frame rates rather than the minimum framerates cause if the frame is steady at 100 and the all of a sudden drops below 55, it is highly noticable, annoying and immersion breaking and if it happens consistantly, then its not really a good thing... And I have played quite a few open world games such as sleeping dogs where things like this would be minimal. Granted the graphics in Far Cry 4 is much better than sleeping dogs but working within limitations is always the key. Heck, if you have seen TB's DA:I review, you would see that the stuttering issue is not there

And its not that bad... If I managed to live through the wiiU hate in 2013 by ignoring countless comments and threads, I am pretty sure you can live through Ubisoft's "hate". And I mean, the only reason they are even getting hate is cause they are the main publisher in 2014 that has consistantly managed to get on most people's bad side in 2014. 2013 was EA turn and even 2012, EA was being hated and since Ubisoft has overtaken EA in terms of doing wonky things for this year, Ubisoft is getting all the hate. Who knows which publisher it will be next year so it won't really last forever