I'm terrified. But I really didn't need to know that, either.
I'm terrified. But I really didn't need to know that, either.
JazzB1987 said:
You sure know some funny dogs and cats.
|
Yes, totally the same thing walls in cs and facial models.
If it isn't Nintendo it doesn't count right?
You could also look if any deer in tlou have butthole.
Also you talk about the knowledge of the other guy over dogs and cats.
I bet this animal and several Pokémon are mammals but they don't have differentied sexual organs. What a terrible miss representation and oversight to detail right?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
DonFerrari said:
1 If it isn't Nintendo it doesn't count right? You could also look if any deer in tlou have butthole. Also you talk about the knowledge of the other guy over dogs and cats. 2 I bet this animal and several Pokémon are mammals but they don't have differentied sexual organs. What a terrible miss representation and oversight to detail right? |
1 Dont move down the nonsense road please.
Yes both are totally the same thing. Educate yourself about textures and shaders and then please reply again. or dont. Do as you wish. (PROTIP a face is a surface as much as a wall and both can be made of polygons.)
2 again....
If you do a cartoon version of an animal that does exist in real life or is losely based on something that exists in real life etc you dont just go and make everything make sense and then add a detail like a belly button (which is completely unneeded since its not supposed to be realistic) but move the belly button to the butthole position.... or move the right eye where the titties should be etc. You simply dont do it unless its supposed to be abstract on purpose which in the pokemon example is not the case. Sexual organs missing in pokemon is not an oversight because its not relevant since its not a realistic game at all.
This would be abstract on purpose
btw TLOU is supposed to be a realistic game. If you dont add buttholes its actually an oversight because you fail at being realistic because the focus is on being realistic (visually). Attention to detail would be adding a nodding dog (that actually works) to a cars dashboard in this case because the nodding dog is completely optional. It would not be optional if you would enter a store that is selling nodding dogs tho.
Btw having a living forest full of realistic behaving animals (so obviously the deers too) in itself is attention to detail. Because there would not be need for the deer at all. So I am not saying the TLoU has no attention to detail but just because two games have the same thing does not make both qualify as "attention to detail." (having an authentic F-Zero stage in Smash is attention to detail. Having the same stage in F-zero is not. The individual things in the stage are tho)

Looks like a hotdog, a billion animals mixed together.
JazzB1987 said:
|
If you don't want to move don't simply bash another thing. He asked if another company had as much attention to detail I said ND and QD have, but you had an urge to downplay it but now goes complaining? I'll educate myself on a texture being a texture as if textures can' have different levels of detail and texture on Cs is almost like tlou, and pretend that isn't a bash on it.
if you do a cartoon version of anything you aren't demanded to met real counterpart, but you can't praise attention to detail by putting an asshole but not access criticism about lacking all indication of sex of the animal.
back to your texture coment. Then SSBU is the same as SSB 64 because they are made of polygons and texture.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
DonFerrari said:
If you don't want to move don't simply bash another thing. He asked if another company had as much attention to detail I said ND and QD have, but you had an urge to downplay it but now goes complaining? I'll educate myself on a texture being a texture as if textures can' have different levels of detail and texture on Cs is almost like tlou, and pretend that isn't a bash on it. if you do a cartoon version of anything you aren't demanded to met real counterpart, but you can't praise attention to detail by putting an asshole but not access criticism about lacking all indication of sex of the animal. back to your texture coment. Then SSBU is the same as SSB 64 because they are made of polygons and texture. |
What???
I compare a model (wall even if can have as few as 1 surface. Well lets call it room instead) to a 3d model (face with several surfaces) both have or have not depending on artstyle textures and shaders applied to them. Filling the face with photoshop "pores" is no attention to detail. Adding individual scars and moles and wrinkles can be.
You compare a whole product to another whole product rofl (my logic would be SmashU is a game Smash 64 also is).. I never said a Naughty Dog face is a Counter Strike wall. I said the pores on them are nothing else than the structure on a CS wall and thats 100% correct.
But whatever. You are right. Smash WiiU is smash 64 and using STRG+V on every single face is attention to detail. Btw giving humans "skin color" is also attention to detail.

Killed a million o' those munchy turds and I never noticed that.
It does look like a belly button, though its location isn't very belly-buttony.
Currently playing:
Bloodbath Paddy Wagon Ultra 9
| Fusioncode said: Is this porn? |
We cant take any chances. Lets just assume it is.
*fap* *fap*
| JazzB1987 said:
|
Let me get this straight. You're accusing a fictional game that takes place during the zombie apocalypse of not being realistic enough to draw buttholes.

Sigs are dumb. And so are you!


| DonFerrari said: He asked if another company had as much attention to detail I said ND and QD have |
Wait, you took my OP seriously? I was just shit stirring man.