By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JazzB1987 on 04 December 2014
Edit Thread
DonFerrari said:
JazzB1987 said:
geordash1 said:
It's definitely a belly button. Why would the skin around the hole be that large and hairless?

Have you ever seen a dog, cat, rodent, hell just any mammal at all, in real life, OP?

You sure know some funny dogs and cats.

Imagine a line that connect the rear legs okay? So what do you see? The "belly button" is on or almost on that line. Interesting isnt it?

Since when are belly buttons directly under the tail and on the same "line" as rear legs?


DonFerrari said:
QD and ND facial models having pores are a lot more attention to detail and a lot more holes.


a wall in counter strike also has "pores".

It is no work to add a "pore" texture/shader to stuff with the same space between all the pores etc.

Adding a butthole when there is absolutely no need to since it has no impact on immersion etc  is tho.


Yes, totally the same thing walls in cs and facial models.

1 If it isn't Nintendo it doesn't count right?

You could also look if any deer in tlou have butthole.

Also you talk about the knowledge of the other guy over dogs and cats.

2 I bet this animal and several Pokémon are mammals but they don't have differentied sexual organs. What a terrible miss representation and oversight to detail right?


1 Dont move down the nonsense road please.

Yes both are totally the same thing. Educate yourself about textures and shaders and then please reply again. or dont. Do as you wish. (PROTIP a face is a surface as much as a wall and both can be made of polygons.)


2 again....

If you do a cartoon version of an animal that does exist in real life or is losely based on something that exists in real life etc  you dont just go and make everything make sense and then add a detail like a belly button (which is completely unneeded since its not supposed to be realistic) but move the belly button to the butthole position.... or move the right eye where the titties should be  etc. You simply dont do it unless its supposed to be abstract on purpose which in the pokemon example is not the case. Sexual organs missing in pokemon is not an oversight because its not relevant since its not a realistic game at all.

This would be abstract on purpose





btw TLOU is supposed to be a realistic game. If you dont add buttholes its actually an oversight because you fail at being realistic because the focus is on being realistic (visually). Attention to detail would be adding a nodding dog (that actually works) to a cars dashboard in this case because the nodding dog is completely optional. It would not be optional if you would enter a store that is selling nodding dogs tho.

Btw having a living forest full of realistic behaving animals (so obviously the deers too) in itself is attention to detail. Because there would not be need for the deer at all.  So I am not saying the TLoU has no attention to detail but just because two games have the same thing does not make both qualify as "attention to detail." (having an authentic F-Zero stage in Smash is attention to detail. Having the same stage in F-zero is not. The individual things in the stage are tho)