By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - BAD GAMES: Zelda Ocarina of Time

Zekkyou said:
WhiteEaglePL said:
Best comment from those comments there:

"
1.You know why they didn't have CD's? Because Sony and Phillips robbed Nintendo!
2.The Game had 30 fps so it was fine.
3.Nintendo didn't include voice acting because it was terrible at that time
Do some research before you make a rant about something because that makes you seem like an Idiot and it's Bulshit"

1. Wrong.
2. Wrong.
3. No idea if that's really why NIntendo didn't include any, but it's true the N64's lack of memory would have been a major limitation for voice acting.

I always love it up when people list things that are wrong and follow it up with "Do your research" This comment and the video deserve each other.


I don't know about Philips, but Sony almost got money/rights to something/ something I forgot  off from Nintendo, so Ninty stopped working with them.

Then Sony decided to work on thier own instead since the original plan or whatever failed and BOOM PS1.



Around the Network

Ugh... this shouldn't bother me, but it does... and I hate myself for it :c



Zekkyou said:

3. No idea if that's really why NIntendo didn't include any, but it's true the N64's lack of memory would have been a major limitation for voice acting.

I always love it up when people list things that are wrong and follow it up with "Do your research" This comment and the video deserve each other.


N64 has more memory than PS1 and some PS1 games had voice acting. So....



"The N64 had worse graphics than the PSOne."

I have no idea what crazy universe this idjit is living in. The N64 blows the PSOne out of the water graphically. I should know: I had a large library for both.



I didn't really watch the entire thing, but the only legitimate complaint he has that I can actually somewhat agree with is the speed of the text. Otherwise, it's complete bull and he's probably just a troll. If not, he doesn't really understand gaming.



Around the Network
Egann said:
"The N64 had worse graphics than the PSOne."

I have no idea what crazy universe this idjit is living in. The N64 blows the PSOne out of the water graphically. I should know: I had a large library for both.

there is some people here in VGC that belive PS1 was the most powerful console of its gen



Pretty much a good example on how not to make a review. It's hard to call it a review when it's more of a nick picky rant about everything wrong with the game.



Egann said:
"The N64 had worse graphics than the PSOne."

I have no idea what crazy universe this idjit is living in. The N64 blows the PSOne out of the water graphically. I should know: I had a large library for both.


I think the worst thing about him saying that is that shortly after, he literally uses a PS1 game as a comparison to illustrate how bad OoT looks.  While the PS1 game he mentioned was FF7, it really doesn't help his case still that he would say PS1>N64 then use a PS1 game as a standard of how bad the N64 game looks.



Thanks for this thread.

Now I know how to make your videos get more views. Make negative reviews of great games and people will spread it like wildfire wooo.



 

 

WhiteEaglePL said:

I don't know about Philips, but Sony almost got money/rights to something/ something I forgot  off from Nintendo, so Ninty stopped working with them.

Then Sony decided to work on thier own instead since the original plan or whatever failed and BOOM PS1.


Sony almost got the rights (or some type or "right") to some of Nintendos IPs i belive for a game or something, so Nintendo backed out of the deal and went with phillips, and the most ironic thing is that it was Phillips who ended up with the rights to a Mario and Zelda game and then the worst Mario and Zelda game were born, on the Phillips CDI

   I