Honestly.. I'm not surprised that Ubisoft didn't even try with this port... It was doomed to sell like shit.. :/
---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---
Honestly.. I'm not surprised that Ubisoft didn't even try with this port... It was doomed to sell like shit.. :/
---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---
phaedruss said: I don't buy that for a second. Even if true they are missing out on a lot of great games if they don't buy games with any bugs. |
That rather misses the point though doesn't it. Every game has bugs - Nintendo's are no exception. The problem that I and many other Wii U owners have is delayed sloppy 20fps ports with low res graphics and blatantly zero effort. This is the kind of thing that Nintendo fans I feel are particularly vigilant about.
You have to remember that the demographic of Wii U owners, and that includes myself, are dramatically different to the demographics of owners of the other 2 consoles. The Wii U is currently a niche console and therefore appeals to a more niche audience who generally know what they want, and Ubisoft garbage ain't it.
Mnementh said:
Ubi can't even make games for PCs, AC:Unity has problems even on modern PCs. |
On a forum someone was complaining about the fps and he was having an I7 so for sure they will have problems with the WIi u
I doubt that - with Bayonetta 2, SSB, Hyrule Warriors etc. - WiiU owners will care about this poor port.
I may get it in the future...if I found it really cheap.
Ubisoft screwed WiiU owners with the Rayman Legends episode and screwed them again with Watch Dogs (supposely the game WAS ready a long time ago, supposely they COULD have launched with the other versions). No wonder its games are not selling wel on that platform.
fluky-nintendy said: Besides the under-utilization of the gamepad, no rocks thrown at Ubi this time. They did what they could to put it on an underpowered console, don't know who's expecting PS4/XB1 quality third party on wiiU, but never go there expecting that. |
"So an inferior version of a middling game, with less content that costs more and is 6 months late. Well at least Ubisoft tried...."
My bet with The_Liquid_Laser: I think the Switch won't surpass the PS2 as the best selling system of all time. If it does, I'll play a game of a list that The_Liquid_Laser will provide, I will have to play it for 50 hours or complete it, whatever comes first.
phaedruss said:
|
Have you ever considered that Nintendo fans buy third party content on other platforms? I also, for example, play on PC and Xbox 360, but even then, I bought every single non-shovelware piece by Ubisoft on Wii U and at the end I got this, a 6 month delayed port at 60 dollars, and still, there was never really a good reason to get Ubisoft games on Wii U even over 360. You have to understand this.
My bet with The_Liquid_Laser: I think the Switch won't surpass the PS2 as the best selling system of all time. If it does, I'll play a game of a list that The_Liquid_Laser will provide, I will have to play it for 50 hours or complete it, whatever comes first.
Metallox said
|
What does that have to do with what I was talking about?
What was the bet that the OP won?
phaedruss said:
|
Of course it does.
I don't buy third party games because they aren't from Nintendo? No.
My bet with The_Liquid_Laser: I think the Switch won't surpass the PS2 as the best selling system of all time. If it does, I'll play a game of a list that The_Liquid_Laser will provide, I will have to play it for 50 hours or complete it, whatever comes first.
Metallox said:
Of course it does. I don't buy third party games because they aren't from Nintendo? No. |
I'm not talking about you or to you. I'm talking about the general wii u owner. Yes those people will and probably do buy third party games on other platforms that's not the point. The point is that your average wii u owner is no more discerning for "quality" products than anyone else.
Wow ...
This is the opposite of what I envisioned ...
You win, OP ...