By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - The worst video game of all time?

 

Worst game ever?

Custer's Revenge (Atari 2600) 10 8.13%
 
Back to the Future (NES) 3 2.44%
 
Shaq Fu (SNES, Genesis, Game Gear, Gameboy) 8 6.50%
 
Superman 64 72 58.54%
 
Kabuki Warriors (xbox) 4 3.25%
 
Drake of the 99 Dragons (xbox, PC) 1 0.81%
 
Animal Soccer World (playstation 2) 2 1.63%
 
Simcity (PC 2013 game) 1 0.81%
 
Plumbers don't wear Ties (3DO) 17 13.82%
 
South Park (PC, Playstation) 5 4.07%
 
Total:123
Dulfite on 18 November 2014

Also, I've decided to make a "challenge" for horrible games. I'm hoping it will be lots of fun!



Around the Network
Teeqoz on 18 November 2014
Chris Hu said:
Teeqoz said:

Is it impossible to play it with emulators? Anyway, I wouldn't judge a game I've never played, especially when it's for a title like "worst video game of all time".

But with video games you really don't have to play them yourself to know how bad a game really is since there are plenty of videos that show how bad those bad games are.


Does that really look like the worst video game ever? For an Atari game it looks fairly average. Sure it wrecked the industry, but as a game itself it isn't horrible.



Zekkyou on 18 November 2014

I don't want to name anything i haven't actually played, but it's very rare for me to play a game i don't think is at least 'good' (i tend to research games before buying them, with the general aim being to avoid the shit ones :p).

The best (worst) i can think of would be Disney's Dinosaur on the PS1. I remember quite enjoying it as a kid, but then i also enjoyed picking my nose and and throwing dirt at my garden fence. In hindsight, throwing dirt was more fun.



RidingMower on 18 November 2014

Voted Custer's Revenge because playing Custer and raping a American Indian woman up against a cactus is pretty bad.



Chris Hu on 18 November 2014

It does look pretty bad of course there are a ton of other 2600 games that look just as bad but none of those cost even a fraction of E.T.   Just to secure the license Atari spend an $20 to $25 million dollars which is almost more then twice the production budget of the actual movie which was $10.5 million dollars.



Around the Network
IkePoR on 18 November 2014

So are we talking games that simply do not work(Sonic 06), or games that work badly(Final Fantasy 14)?



"You should be banned. Youre clearly flaming the president and even his brother who you know nothing about. Dont be such a partisan hack"

Teeqoz on 18 November 2014
Chris Hu said:

It does look pretty bad of course there are a ton of other 2600 games that look just as bad but none of those cost even a fraction of E.T.   Just to secure the license Atari spend an $20 to $25 million dollars which is almost more then twice the production budget of the actual movie which was $10.5 million dollars.


What does cost have to do with the quality of a game? 



curl-6 on 19 November 2014

A NEW CHALLENGER APPEARS!

This was approved for Wii U eshop today:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoGTTzs2PLg



Dulfite on 19 November 2014
IkePoR said:
So are we talking games that simply do not work(Sonic 06), or games that work badly(Final Fantasy 14)?


Anything that has been OFFICIALLY released. Anotherwords, no Mother 4...



Dulfite on 19 November 2014
curl-6 said:

A NEW CHALLENGER APPEARS!

This was approved for Wii U eshop today:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoGTTzs2PLg


LULZ!!!