I feel like many of you guys are going a bit overboard. Its 15 reviews with only two big outlets reviewing it so far (Polygon/Destructoid).

What im saying is there is going to be plenty more reviews and the score could drastically change for better or worst which is going to make a lot of these comments look pointless and may even come back to bite you.

Why is there so much whinging over a score? 87 Meta is damn good all considering. Reviewers might score something different to what you think.. but at the end of the day, if you're a Halo fan (or liked any of the Halo games), then MCC is a sure buy. The amount of content and games in it is astonising for the price.

Hopefully it rises to 90 so we can return back to the 90's roadblock trend. I miss collection scores being easy to predict :c

I feel like the general concensus is it deserves a 90 and it prob will end up around a 90, maybe high 80's or low 90's.  But reviewers are harsher this generation as it has shown in several occurences so who knows.  It has been very hard to predict what reviewers have been wanting to do this generation

yes. no playstation sites review so far
this can easily go down to 85

What exactly are the Playstation sites?

Halo 4 is a 2 year old game that got a 87. I guess remastering halo 1,3. And remaking halo 2 with 6 new maps is only worth 1 point.... Oh well I expected that.

Why would a PlayStation site would rate this game? Unless you mean the biased sites.

I see this game staying below 89.

88 is pretty damn good, but I wonder what some sites counted as negatives.

reviews from sites like the sixthaxxis, playstation universe, playstation gamer, psnation, psx extreme, playstion offical magazine *insert country here*, and many more.

but ofc not many of them will rate xbox only games. but maybe a few. maybe none? dunno?