Mr_No said:
Soundwave said:
Mr_No said:
Barebones in which sense?
|
It just doesn't interface with any media that I have. I can pop a movie file on a USB stick and play it on my PS3, can't do that with a PS4, it just feels like basically all I use the OS for is to load up a game and nothing else.
The X1 to me, even though MS has taken a lot of sh*t, feels a lot more robust as an overall platform.
|
It can play music now from a pendrive now. You can't play movies from the same pendrive, but you can pop in a Blu-Ray and watch it, use Netflix or Hulu to watch some shows, hell... even Youtube. And even with all of that, it can go from a game to the menu pretty quickly, even going as far as letting you play a game before it fully installs. So your argument is that the PS4 is barebones just because it doesn't play video files? Okay...
|
To me it's a step backwards. I had to go back to using my PS3 because my PS4 doesn't have the same functionality, IMO that's just not right. I mean playing music off the pen drive, that's nice (who really does that though?), but I guess why not movies?
I think the backlash to MS' "always online" and thus crapping on everything about the MS' OS was a bit unfortunate from the online community. Sometimes onlines gamers can behave like spoiled children throwing a temper tantrum. MS' vision for the whole console OS and integrating it with TV is actually not that bad, I tried it out over the weekend, and I have to admit it's pretty nice to be able to flip to TV channels without putting the controller down or voice navigate TV channels.
But all we got was "Ermyagawd! Stop talking about Teeee Veee! I wants to see Halo 5!!" at E3, lol. I admit I got suckered into that whole narrative, but since I've actually tried the X1 I have to admit their approach has some real merit to it. Their OS feels more "alive" and more robust and connected to my overall living room than Sony's setup.