By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Does Shadow of Mordor Run at 720p/30fps on Xbox One?

torok on 29 September 2014
Dark_Feanor said:
 


You realy go deep into things.

Golf Club, realy? Sorry, but I only have time for games that Digital Foundry makes a Face-off.

And PES? It´s the Fox Engine there is clearly some problems with Konami dev team.

My point remains. If the engine is garbage or developers don´t have time/man power to tune the game those odd balls remains, as we still had at late last genaration games that suffers on the PS3 (Skyrim, someone?).

You are a smart guy, how else could you explain those 5 cases against more than 50 others multplat games running at closer or identical resolution/fps? Even indie games are easily reaching parity.


Come on, using indie games with visuals dated even for PS3 and can run on PCs with Intel GPUs is really a big stretch here.



Bet with jetforcejiminy: PS4 will pass the Wii lifetime numbers.

Around the Network
ethomaz on 29 September 2014

torok said:

Come on, using indie games with visuals dated even for PS3 and can run on PCs with Intel GPUs is really a big stretch here.

He believed it was defending Xbone but it was the opposite



S.T.A.G.E. on 29 September 2014
Dark_Feanor said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:

Look up almost any spec comparison video on Youtube. The PS4 is 50% faster than the Xbone. 


The GPU side only.

CPU is the same, memory reservation is the same, memory bandwide is very close if you use the ERAM smartely.

720 vs 1080p is a odd ball here and happend only twice since launch. Unless your game engine sucks hard the "natural" gap is 40% (900 vs 1080 or 720 vs 900).

Machinima made computers with the specs of the Xbox One and PS4 and basically the PS4 beat it in almost every category. This gen the Xbox is going to have to be valued by its audience outside of power. They need to make Xbox Live truly stand out to make a difference to else outside. Personally I couldn't give a crap. I like my Xbox One because of Killer Instinct and it will probably be my Halo box.



Dark_Feanor on 29 September 2014
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Dark_Feanor said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:

Look up almost any spec comparison video on Youtube. The PS4 is 50% faster than the Xbone. 


The GPU side only.

CPU is the same, memory reservation is the same, memory bandwide is very close if you use the ERAM smartely.

720 vs 1080p is a odd ball here and happend only twice since launch. Unless your game engine sucks hard the "natural" gap is 40% (900 vs 1080 or 720 vs 900).

Machinima made computers with the specs of the Xbox One and PS4 and basically the PS4 beat it in almost every category. This gen the Xbox is going to have to be valued by its audience outside of power. They need to make Xbox Live truly stand out to make a difference to else outside. Personally I couldn't give a crap. I like my Xbox One because of Killer Instinct and it will probably be my Halo box.


Link please, but if you are going to give the "theoretical performance" BS, based on half asset supositions don´t even bother.



Dark_Feanor on 29 September 2014
ethomaz said:

torok said:

Come on, using indie games with visuals dated even for PS3 and can run on PCs with Intel GPUs is really a big stretch here.

He believed it was defending Xbone but it was the opposite


Please, stop using smiles, it´s naughing and explains not but your arrogance and lack of arguments.

Moderated,

-Mr Khan



Around the Network
krippaz on 29 September 2014

Well we all know ps4 is 50 % better or more , nothing new here



ethomaz on 29 September 2014

Dark_Feanor said:

Please, stop using smiles, it´s naughing and explains not but your arrogance and lack of arguments.

Smiles is cool and it will always be.

Now you can stop to bullshit to yourself.



S.T.A.G.E. on 29 September 2014
Dark_Feanor said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:

Machinima made computers with the specs of the Xbox One and PS4 and basically the PS4 beat it in almost every category. This gen the Xbox is going to have to be valued by its audience outside of power. They need to make Xbox Live truly stand out to make a difference to else outside. Personally I couldn't give a crap. I like my Xbox One because of Killer Instinct and it will probably be my Halo box.


Link please, but if you are going to give the "theoretical performance" BS, based on half asset supositions don´t even bother.

How many times do I post theories around here? Most of what I say is based upon what I've read or seen. Anyway...here it is from Machinima.


Its ALU (arithmetic logic unit)  is 50% faster <--That which causes bottlenecks in most computers 

while its memory reads are 40-50% faster than the Xbone. 

There is more but the only actual thing the Xbox One has over the PS4 is procedural generation- ray tracing...which no one really knows what that means.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxmtncgURRY



S.T.A.G.E. on 29 September 2014
Captain_Tom said:
KingdomHeartsFan said:

If its true that's the biggest difference in a multiplat we have seen so far I think.


Tomb Raider was pretty close if I remember correctly.


If you have a console the PS4 is definitely the console to play the prettiest version of Tomb Raider. The Xbone looked so washed out it wasnt even funny and it will still stuck at 720p.



Dark_Feanor on 29 September 2014
S.T.A.G.E. said:

Its ALU (arithmetic logic unit)  is 50% faster <--That which causes bottlenecks in most computers 

while its memory reads are 40-50% faster than the Xbone. 

There is more but the only actual thing the Xbox One has over the PS4 is procedural generation- ray tracing...which no one really knows what that means.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxmtncgURRY

I have a feeling that you don´t know what those words mean.

And what that has to do with CPU and OS memory reservation and memory bandwide?

And how could that make a game have 400% better performance on the PS4?