elnino334 said:
The 360 wasn't hyped as much as the PS3 promising two hdmi ports with dual 1080P screens etc. The PS3 had all these launch games like msg and others that have yet to see th light of day etc. All the 360 has had all this time is being the first one out of the gate and having a great library of games. All this domination stuff is made up by fanboys. The reason SONY blew it as you claim is because of the 360 else we would still have a $600 PS3 to this date. Competition brought the PS3 down to $399 not SONY screw up at least in my opinion. The 360 was doing fine for a $399 console same with the PS3 though once tose prices dropped sales increased and will continue to do so. Basically with your logic the PS3 is also a fraud? Again your saying the PS3 is also lacking the WoW factor? COuld it be that some of the earlier 360 games where basically PS2 ports? How about when you finally saw a game build from the ground up like gears it didn't wow you? Guess is just personal opinion and I think yours is mainly in the minority. Plenty of reasons to like a 360 usually the main reason gamers like a system and that is games. As you mentioned the 360 has a great library so what is your point? Not going to comment on that paragraph since your just rambling. Finally you do make some good points in your final paragraph though the AAA games part is debatable at this point. Guess you can just keep hoping the 360 goes away somehow. |
Yes, I am saying currently the PS3 doesn't have a "Wow" factor either. Its why neither of the consoles sell as well as the Wii. The PS3 does have some ambitious things coming. Home can change the way we view a gaming console entirely. Instead of just turning on a console, playing a game, and then turning it off, you can have your idle time be occupied by meeting up with friends, family, or clans. Clan recruiting would be different, peolple who like cetain games can meet up and make new friends.
All the extra features of the PS3 aside, on the gaming side the PS3 has been stated by developers to have huge untapped potential. We've seen parts of that in Heavy Rain, Final Fantasy, Killzone, RFOM2, GT5. Those games are jaw dropping, atleast by the looks of it so far. Nothing up to this point on the 360 has even near the levels those games are shooting for. No preview of any game has hinted towards being near that level either. GeoW2 may, but we haven't seen any video/images from that yet. Its been over a year since Gears of War, and that is still the best looking game on the 360.
Thats where my issue relies. I don't want the 360 to go away, I couldn't care less. And evidentally, neither can the rest of the world outside of NA after Halo 3. Any exclusive on the 360, save Bioshock, Gears, would only leave me slightly impressed if it appeared on the original Xbox. Sure the 360 might have a few games that will get lots of publicity or have great storylines that will sell, but no game on the 360 is going to sell just because of the looks or what its trying to technically. Thats what people paid over $300 dollars for. Its for a HUGE upgrade, not a PS2.5. The 360 has a good library of solid games like I said, but not for the reasons we upgraded consoles for.
Of course you can say its all my opinion, which it 100% is. If you think Halo 3 is a masterpiece that we couldn't even imagine was possible on the PS2 or Xbox, good for you. I, however think that "next-gen" should be ALOT better than all that. If thats all this generation has to offer, then I doubt the PS3 and 360 combined will ever reach half the PS2's install base combined. Complete failure.