Fixed that for you. What you don't seem to understand, and fail to learn from recent history of DLC increase its that this practice WILL lead to all games from that publisher being behind that paywall. Sure they will give you a 10% discount but good luck playing the game/multiplayer/dlc without owning the subscription.

I mean limited budget for a new console. If you have a limited budget overall then how can you buy a 400$ console ehh. If you have 500$ for the console that roughly gives you the console with one game when you add taxes. With EAA that gives you 5 games on top of the games XBLG gives you. It also gives you 10% discount on new games on top of the discounts XBLG gives you.

You mean that unless you subs to EAA you will not be able to buy any of their games? When we'll get there we'll talk. Until then don't act like it's fact.

What is a demo to a potential buyer? It's only the best way for him/her to personally decide whether to get the game or not.

I won't get Fifa 15 at launch and I know a lot of people will hold out so we can purchase other games first. Meanwhile, we can still play Fifa 14 while we wait.

It ain't hard to understand if you want to.

Yeah because everyone just stops playing the previous version just because the new game comes out You also didn't mention Peggle 2 or Battlefield 4, we can add in NFS Rivals soon. Also the 6 hours is for you to try out the game, EA would be stupid to offer more (would eliminate the whole point of people buying the game). 

Got to find a way to keep the negativity flowing. A ton of ppl carry their franchises for awhile. Or MyPlayer in Nba on the previous version. Then like you said he conveniently left off the games you mentioned lol. These guys are reaching like Stretch Armstrong. Disgusting

That's exactly where they are headed. It's the ultimate form of DRM. What better way to make sure people purchase the games they play then by keeping access to those purchased games behind a subscription? Remember EA's huge on trying to push DRM on people, and this is just their first step to doing it on consoles. After all piracy is huge on consoles. All they are doing is taking what MS did with XBL and what Sony did with Ps+ and combining it and instead of using it on some aspects of consoles they will be doing it with their games. Which is very dangerous. Don't act like it's not going to happen. it is a fact that it will happen so long as people sit back and let it happen. Open your eyes and look around, look at history. EAA, Uplay, Windows Live, it just a matter of time and we are at the doorstep so why should we wait until we get there? By then it will be too late. Instead we should be talking now, we should see the danger signs, and we should understand how much of a slippery slope this is and where it is obviously heading. If we speak up now, if we tell them now we won't stand for the future they want then we can stop it from getting worse.

So according to you any kind of subs is bad and will lead to "kill" the industry? You know that PS+ and XBLG offer you random games for one month while EAA you get access to games in the vault. I'd rather know what I'm getting than not.

I will act like it's not happening right now. I'm not attached to consoles as much as some of you are. I want to play games that's all and if a service allows me to play games at a decent price then why not? If I don't see value in a service I don't subscribe that's all. No need to speculate about how bad it could become. I could instead speculate how good it is right now.

That's not what I'm saying at all, however your lack of understanding explains a lot. Read the TOS if you can't see that this is a push for new DRM that will put access to major portions all the games from that publisher behind a subscription wall like the two of the biggest console platforms have done with multiplayer, then you are likely blinded by bias.

"attached to consoles as much as some of you are" I own every console from last gen and this gen except for a ouya and a steam machine. I care about games before anything else and this will only hurt games. You are obviously overly attached to the XB1 because you are desperately trying to find a reason to support it and set it apart. Using anecdotal evidence from a negligibly small group of people in order to try and say that this sells consoles and will lead to Xb1's eventual success. Which at best is unsubstantiated.

I would say yes.  If the deal allowed me to pick the platform for the game then it would be better to go that route than wait until MS, Sony or Nintendo to strike a deal with a publish.  I would gladly pay 100 bucks in subs if it allowed me to play any game I want on any platform.  It would be much cheaper than paying per game.

Also this would be good because I still can op in or out at any time and I get to choose the publisher I want instead of hoping either XBL or PSN come out with the games I want.  For this type of flexibility it probably would cost more upfront but it would be much cheaper in the long run.