2 different games.. I dont care about remasters getting good sales. It doesnt hurt in any way current gen. What i want is for old gen to die off so limitations of cross gen titles dissapear. Im gonna vote with my wallet and just hope that the old gen title fails miserably so that they wont try it again next year. Still better than releasing the same title on all systems.

But why? None of those games are cross-gen, so they aren't being limited like AC4 was. AC Unity will be a truly next-gen title while Rogue will be a nice game to play on old gan.

Rogue in no way hurts Unity.

Ehh, a LOT of early adopter PS4 gamers were 360 exclusive gamers last gen. There are tons of polls on GAF, here, everywhere that show that to be the case, and the sales split shows that is probably the case. People that buy $399 and $499 consoles aren't the casuals. These are the people who played one or both consoles last gen fairly seriously, and that shows on the software sales. PS4 new releases regularly sell more than 360/PS3 releases even with a fraction of the install base.

I bought TLOU last time, and am not planning to buy it again. I do think it was a good move to release a PS4 version though, because of all the people that missed it last time.

I think it isn't and I tell you why. The Last of Us, just like GTA V, was designed for the 7th gen (they were even announced before the 8th gen consoles). However, since nowadays games are taking years to develop, GTA V and TLoU got into the "unpleasant" situation of being released in the same year as the next gen consoles. Then, the producers decided to launch enhanced versions for the 8th gen one year after the original release. Therefore, we can take it as a lesser evil (it would have been worse not to allow the next generation to play them and having to wait 4 or 5 years to play an eventual sequel) from an undesirable situation.

Assassin's Creed Unity/Rogue are the exact opposite. It is a premeditated move from Ubisoft to recycle the game to the previous generation (Rogue) after announcing an iteration totally 8th gen (Unity). Gamers perceive it's a cash-grab rather than an attempt to continue the evolution of the series.

Yep. This is what i'm talking about. Unsure why this reason is being ignored. The real double standard is everyome tearing into COD and NSMB while high-fiving Ubisoft for doing this.

Plus, correct me if i'm wrong but aren't Assassin's Creed games selling less with each new version? Or am I mistaking that with something else.

Whether or not AC is annulaized too much has nothing to do with the thread, the thread is just about how Ubisoft decided to bring an Assassins' Creed for each gen, so everyone could enjoy the franchise (if they so wish).

If you don't like it, fine, but this thread isn't about bashing AC. Do that elsewhere. 

Technically speaking... every single game is a cash grab. Its not like devs live on rainbows and shit....

To OP: I don't understand what the reasoning is for anyone doing what you are talking about. Personally, I couldn't care less if they wanted to release another version of th egame for the 3ds/vita and another one for android/IOS. I will just get the one for the platform I own or the one that seems to be the best version if I own more than one supported platform.

Bashing AC? I didnt say I didnt like it once. Heck, I literally said I was neutral to this because I havent played AC before. I played a tiny bit of one and found it incredibly fun, even.

The thread is asking what problem people might have with the two games releasing and I answered it.  I'm simply stating an opinion people have. All ive seen from this thread is ""people dont like it because they're whiny babies""

who specifically can you apply this to?...

and if you can name such a person or persons would it not make far more sense to pm them and discuss this with them instead of generalising which waters down any point you were trying to make?

man up and call someone out so we can actually have a relevent discussion here