The rules in the OP neither confirm nor deny mafia daytalk. I remember a time when it was allowed, so it's not always a given.

Regarding assimilation, that is not even close to being true for the vast majority of mafia players. It takes extreme commitment and dedication which few players possess. One time I played against someone with that sort dedication, but he too was caught in the end.

That has nothing to do with anything! Xo

I don't. I'd happily tell you what it was, but then again I see no real point in doing so. 

Similarly, it's surely more fun if people try and guess, no? This is a game after all

Well then you haven't been paying much attention. stfu you

@cone
surely there is a more important game to be playing right now.
can you look over my post about hylian and also look at Mr Khan vote and tell me what you think?

Hmm, true. So surely my character means very little anyway? 

Similarly I've got quite a bad headache so will only give a brief look. For Khan's vote, personally I disagree with it. Sure you're playing an aggressive game but it's a positive one to try and extract information from other players; as opposed to other users who simply don't comment aside from trying to avoid suspicion and not answering questions posed by other users, as some here are.

In addition there's far too many posts between yourself and Hylian for me to know exactly which one you mean. If it's the one where you accuse him, however, and judging from the rest of the discussion you've had, personally I would say you're making a mistake. He's playing for the first time and also misses much of what goes on during the day, making it difficult for himself to defend and partake in other discussion. I don't blame him for making mistakes, either. What with being a new player and being asked lots of questions straight away, it's not overly surprising.

Having said that there's definitely something suspicious about him. He was the "third" user of whom I was considering due to reasons you outlined in that post predominantly, but being the first day in the first time I've played anything like this, I'd like to wait until towards the very end of the day before casting my vote. So in short, I don't agree 100% with the vote and the swiftness of the conclusion, but you've done this before so could have seen something I haven't. Hence, perhaps it was the right thing to do.

Isn't that like half the game though? It's all psychological guess work, especially when no actions have taken place yet.

Thanks cone for your input.

My reasoning for Hylian is several-fold.

1. He's played mafia before. Not in the forum, but he's played the party game IRL. He knows what he's doing.
2. Mafia, in my experience, generally exhibit inconsistency. He says I should go whether I'm town or scum, and doesn't even vote for me, though he DOES make sure a vote by RCT is bolded and counted. Then he says one reason he doesn't like me is because of my activity and aggression, yet he says he usually plays aggressively too. Lastly, he thinks activity is scummy, but then kind of hesitates when the veterans disagree, and then asks the audience what they think. He makes a case against me about semantics, but yet never really asks me about the posts in question. I know when I disagree with something, I ask a lot of questions so that I can make sure of my suspicions. He doesn't demonstrate this and instead boils it all down to buzzwords. Finally, there's a part where he imitates me, but really gets it all completely wrong. I don't say "you're asking about rules, you must know something". I saw nick make a mention of talking being an action, so I checked my action card and saw that talking was nowhere on it. So I suspected that indeed his card might say something like "can talk at night". etc. It was a hunch...but Hylian didn't bother to ask me about that. Again, all he wants to do is post his accusations, and try to get other people to vote so that he's not attached to this mislynch. It's typical mafia strategy.
3. He's been MIA since I voted him. He hasn't defended himself against my accusations. I find that suspicious.

Does it bother you that I said that?

And to correct you (as a friend), half the game is "yomi", not wifom. Yomi is acting in a way that is opposite to what you're expected to based on your own typical behavior, and the knowledge that the other person may know that.

WIFOM is when someone says "Why would I do that as mafia", or "if I were X, it wouldn't make sense for me to do that". The intent of such a statement is to make the accuser say "yes, you're right that doesn't make sense", but the answer is that the accused would do that BECAUSE it doesn't fit the profile.

I am trying to keep an open mind, and I am trying to find a reason to trust you. I am considering taking my vote off you because I have some trust for Padib and sparks. I have no trust in you, you've lost that trust. I've already made my accusations and supported them with evidence. Your responses were unconvincing because they came off as evasive and dishonest. I want to find a reason to trust you but the fact that you continue to push me and try to manipulate me is only making that more difficult. I'm not going to repeat myself. Instead I'm going to spend that time looking for other suspicious people. Now you can continue to try and goad me into a circuler debate reapting everything and ignoring everything. Or you can help me find someone that is more suspicious and has more substantial and damning evidence. Convince me and I'll have reason to change my vote to them. That's the only kind of deal you are going to get from me. 

it is a wii game tho right? I only have a Wii U atm. is there a seperate version for the U? Also would the game pad work?