Hector is no Knight.

Fine, a Lord then. Same rule applies.

As I said, haven't played Rekka No Ken so I'm not overly familiar with it. Only one I haven't sadly.

A shame. Hector was certainly unique as a Lord, considering he's different from all the other Lords in Fire Emblem. In fact, you don't really understand why is he even a Lord unless you beat Blazing Sword and play it a second time, on the highest difficulty.

Any chance the FEs will b brought to Wii U?

You can always play Radiant Dawn on WiiU :P

Is it any good compared to the others?

It is extremely good; and challenging altogether.

I've spent the last hours thinking about what everyone has said so far, and what they havn't said so far. I've been thinking a lot about what you've said and what Padib has said. We have until 8/11 at midnight CST according to WoW's post on page one. I still believe prof is Mafai. However I also agree with you and padib that information should be gathered and prof may cause a mafia to slip. Then again he could just as easily focus on someone innocent, but I don't discount the possibility that he could get a mafia to slip in the process. As it stands now I don't think it would be best to let him go, I don't trust him. However I am maliable and I also agree that we should agree on an action that's good for everyone. I think I can trust you and I think I can trust padib. I also don't want to make a mistake with this first vote. So I am going to keep my eyes open, watch everything, and I am going to put a little trust in you guys to convince me. If you can and by the end of the game day I see evidence that's more substantial and damning than what I've seen so far and if there is some kind of tie I may change my vote to align with yours. You guys are more experainced and I don't want to get an innocent person lynched even if I don't trust them, and I want to do everything possible to make sure only mafia gets lynched.

I can kind of understand why you are voting for outlaw. He has been quiet and his activity has been suspect. However it doesn't seem substantial and damning nough to me. However I will definitly keep a close on eye on them and keep them in consideration.

It was only a given because of my understanding of the rules. Whether or not I didn't completely understand the question falls on your wording and my comprehension.

In terms of activity, I can definitely take some criticism there, but it's not like I'm even in the bottom 5 in terms of contribution. Not sure why any scum would want to just sit back completely. Best way to assilmate is to drive conversation and activity. (i.e. you mad that I know who you are)

Apparently my absence is an issue. I've been gone because I don't really have anything good to contribute, since the first day there's no solid basis to vote for anyone. If you want meaningless updates from me to not look suspicious, fine, but it doesn't change who I am.