Sparks said:
As the day's end draws nearer, I feel the need to voice my final conerns. I very much dislike the idea of ending the day without agreeing upon a good action.
As it stands, prof will be the one lynched tonight, when in my opinion there are people WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY more suspicious, and who I would rather see lynched instead. To put my money where my mouth is,
I vote outlawauron
Here are my thoughts: he reminds me of scum I've played with before. Here, but not here. His one contribution was answering a question about the rules, but his answer showed he misunderstood the very question and was not paying much attention to begin with. Not following up on things he says, not initiating any conversation on his own. All basically activity for the sake of activity.
I'm referring to this conversation: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6556320
One thing I don't like about his answer, now that I think about it, is how much of a given "no mafia daytalk" was for him. It didn't even cross his mind that that's what I was asking.
I also don't like RCTjunkie's absence, and IkePoR's non-posts. I wouldn't have much qualm voting for them.
|
It was only a given because of my understanding of the rules. Whether or not I didn't completely understand the question falls on your wording and my comprehension. 
In terms of activity, I can definitely take some criticism there, but it's not like I'm even in the bottom 5 in terms of contribution. Not sure why any scum would want to just sit back completely. Best way to assilmate is to drive conversation and activity. (i.e. you mad that I know who you are)
