LudicrousSpeed said:
Yikes, you're so caught up in ad hominem attacks that you can't even follow the conversation or remember your own posts. Someone else said EA put TF on Xbone exclusively because EA thought PS4 would flop. I replied refuting that. You replied and bolded the part about PS4 flopping, and tried to prove the other poster right with an article that says nothing about it flopping. Now, are you bolding that statement and then trying to prove it correct because you in fact don't believe they thought it would flop? That seems like a highly odd way of going about posting in a forum.
Of course, lets not forget in yet another TF thread you were there spreading the same crap. In this post you not only say EA thought PS4 would flop, but that Xbone would also "blow" the PS4 in sales. Lets check the tapes.. yep, it's even the exact same article you're using in both threads. So lets recap. You think EA believed PS4 would flop, that the Xbox One would "blow" the PS4 in sales, and yet you are upset here because I connect you to an argument you are defending about PS4 getting crushed? Please. Try to be a little less transparent.
Looking forward to the next 4chan gif you can whip out, since you sure don't have any logic to fall back on. I'm just going to ignore you until you can produce something substantial. Cya in the next TF doom thread!
|
So says the guy whose posted mostly "omg.. TF.. Gotg" threads and comments. Thank you.. Come again. You can't even fact check the dates to see that there was a timeline there when everything took place.. But's its okay. Chalk it up to dribble because your only source is a book from respawns end. Surely that helps your argument for why EA did what they did... But no.. Not even you can do that.. Im sure respawn speaks for EA and MS's behalf too.. Can't bother to check the link that gives that info straight from EA's CFO, but take what Respawn devs says in their book as the holy grail. Jorgensen said himself exclusivity made sense because of their analysis. They were expecting higher x1 numbers by TF launch.. but that didn't happen, did it?
Also, did you realize that EA at the time did have high expectations for TF? They swapped TF and Sims 4 in their lineup expecting the tradeoff should yield the same profitability. Jorgensen clearly states "we determine it was a exact trade-off with The Sims profitability if that would've also been in the quarter." Do you know any of the Sims sales numbers? sims 1 (2 years) sold over 6.3 mil units. Sims 2 (5 months) sold over 4.5 mil units. Sims 3 (3months=1 qtr) sold over 3.7 mil units. all on 1 platform. Titanfall (4 months=1.3 qtrs) sold ~2-2.5 mil) and hype/community dying/declining. yea.. multiplat on x360,x1, and pc surely met sales expectations because EA says so without numbers.
you can't even provide anything other than the latest article with EA saying TF beat EA's sales expectations without numbers and you take that and run off with it liked it proved your points. Anyone can use simple logic to get an idea of what EA is really trying to say. No different from MS touting awesome x1 shipped numbers in the beginning though they were getting eclipsed by the Ps4 sales through. So pshhh.. Be gone!
Its nuts that of all the posters on this site.. This dude gets worked up the most over anything TF... Yea.. Great indicator of an objective mind.
regardless, this thread is done. apparently it only attracts the great defenders of x1 with no objective minds. anything that crosses their beloved turns into a flamebait/console war with them. Even when the numbers speak for themselves, they find a way to twist it and assume it's some type of trolling. we will just wait and see. if TF2 sales numbers end up being mediocre then so be it.. it would be because EA's mishandling of the IP. which was the topic of this thread to begin with.