I think you may need to take Reading Comprehension 101, again.  Never said they were bringing back their old policies (24-hr check-in and no used games.)  What I said was that they wouldn't really need to if they are going to try and fool naive people with the "power of the cloud" for even single-player games.  Have basically the same affect.

And no, I don't have any plans to buy a One, soon or ever.  PS4 is where it's at. 

Nice with the reading comprehension. No need for that weak ass retort tho. You wrote "then yes, that is bringing back form of online DRM" 

I did not specify what i was talking about either. Still used a lot of ifs to shit talk MS. Typical and that doesn't need Reading Comprehension 101.

Yea, a form of online DRM, not their original policies.  Again, reading comprehension FTW.

And really, that's only one if. 

WTF i did not specify the drm i said you wanted back. You assumed. Lol talking about Reading Comprehension. Advice-take it dont give it. Please

There reallyyyyyy was more than one if. Reading Comprehension lol

I understand you did not want to read everything I put up, it was alot. But Sony's version of DRm was to embed it on every disc, as opposed to using online check in. this was thier way to circimvent people not connecting their system online to play games. They were going to implement it on disc, that would be read by the hardware.

Where do you come up with this nonsense that Sony would never try DRM? Either you're really young, or have a short memory.

http://www.pcworld.com/article/123362/article.html

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/sony-music-cds-surreptitiously-install-drm-trojan-horses-on-pcs/2092

Tell me again how Sony never did, or would ever install DRM on their disc?

Stop believing these Companies are saints. They did not get that big , and stay that relevant all these years by not stepping on a couple throats along the way.

I would be in agreeance with this comment.  The problem was, console launches and all.. a hyped up IP like Titanfall (remember, the hype began back in summer of 2013) could of done wonders for EA.  Given the release window, timing would of been perfect because both platforms were rather software lacking at the time.  Also, EA  were looking for a COD killer IP and who better to deliver than the original guys who brought COD to those ridiculous levels.  Now it's like I said, by the next sequel release, it'll truely be pitted up against more established/ambitious shooter franchises that already has/will have established a following.  What's going to convince PS gamers to pick up this title or any others down the road?

I'm sorry, but am I the only one that kept reading TF2 as Team Fortress 2 at first and got really confused?

On TF's exclusivity deal..

"Gamezone managed to get in a word with EA's Chief Financial Officer Blake Jorgensen, who stated that...

"I think you should assume that we made that decision when it was back a few years ago when we decided to go exclusive,"

"We had some forecast at that time from where we thought both Xbox and PlayStation would be and that's what we based our decision on. I think we're still feeling very comfortable with that,"

Jorgensen is talking about how the Xbox 360 appeared to have more momentum than the PS3 throughout the seventh gen, and it seemed like the Xbox One would follow suit. He's also talking about EA's forecast that put cumulative sales at 10 million between the Xbox One and PS4 sales... a measure that they think can be reached by March of this year."

http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Titanfall-Was-Exclusive-Xbox-Because-EA-Thought-Xbox-One-Would-Dominate-61946.html

EA really thought there'd be a significant gap difference in sales between consoles.. you'd have to imagine what they are thinking now when they see marketshare and sales differences.

I really think that both MS, and EA both felt that since the 360 was the console of choice for FPS/ pew pew games it made sense that sales would generally be higher on that console, and next gen (X1). With MS greasing the wheels to make it an exclusive,  made it that much easier for EA to go through with it.  This deal was made when both systems were still buzz words, and breaking records.

MS needed a killer game they had the same multiplat shooters as the PS4 at launch, with Sony upping them one with an exclusive Killzone, and the bad press surrounding COD and Battlefield resolution, and FPS. They needed a exclusive game had they been smart, and launched with a new Halo or GOW, or even the masterchief collection, the need to purchase titanfall would not have been needed.

I think MS will not see a real shift in sales for the X1 until Halo MCC is released. Casual gamers do not get excited for preorders, they will purchase when the game is available as a physical copy.

This looks like the same spin you or someone else was putting on the same EA comments in yet another "Titanfall failed" type of thread.

Of course, nothing you posted confirms anything remitely close to EA thinking PS4 would be crushed. In fact it even says they are still comfortable with the projections. So are we spinning to create something they didnt say, while at the same time ignoring what they actually did say? Strange. I'll follow you down this road when you provide an actual quote of them saying PS4 would be crushed.