By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - 3DS Fire Emblem or Bravely Default QUICK!

 

Which one

Fire Emblem 97 69.78%
 
Bravely Default 42 30.22%
 
Total:139
tbone51 said:
think-man said:
tbone51 said:

Both are good you JRPG fanboy :P (Pick Fire Emblem First)

Yep I got Fire Emblem, I actaully had BD lined up cause it was winning at first. Should arrive sometime next week :P


are you new to FE? O.o

Yep, I've only played the Demo of the latest one of the 3DS



Around the Network
think-man said:
tbone51 said:
think-man said:
tbone51 said:

Both are good you JRPG fanboy :P (Pick Fire Emblem First)

Yep I got Fire Emblem, I actaully had BD lined up cause it was winning at first. Should arrive sometime next week :P


are you new to FE? O.o

Yep, I've only played the Demo of the latest one of the 3DS

Well, this is (imo) the best FE and also the most newcomer-friendly, so you'll enjoy, no doubt. Don't be afraid to play on casual if you don't like the idea of permadeath.



                                                                                                               You're Gonna Carry That Weight.

Xbox One - PS4 - Wii U - PC

think-man said:
Ok guys true to my word, I actually thought Bravely Default was going to win. Buying FE right now.

 



Glad you went with Fire Emblem. As much as I appreciate BD, FE:A exceeded my expectations for an FE game, rightfully deserving of being one of the best games on the 3DS.



Fire Emblem get that first then Bravery Default.



Around the Network
Soriku said:
noname2200 said:

 


By my account, he's made a great mistake.

 

What other response could I make?


Soriku said:
noname2200 said:
Soriku said:


By my account, he's made a great mistake.

 

What other response could I make?


Indeed, buying FE was a mistake. I sold it for 2x the price I got it so I can't complain too much.


What didn't you like about it?



Soriku said:
think-man said:


What didn't you like about it?


I posted my review above.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=175211

Well I hate saying someone played the game wrong, but you played the game wrong.

Sounds like you just sent units in battle and hoped they survived and when they didn't you grinded them to be overleveled so they could be sent in a frontal assault.

Fire Emblem is  "Strategy" game.  You need to use strategy.  Have supports stand by each other, use magic/bows to fire from distance, use sword against axe, use tanks, and hit and run with others, ect.

Sounds like you did the pay to win and then complained the game was too easy. 



Haven't played Bravely Default, but I know Fire Emblem was pure bliss when I played it. So Fire Emblem.



Soriku said:


Except you barely need to grind a Sorceror to get them to OP status.

All those strategies you listed have no meaning when you can crush everything mindlessly with a Sorceror. It's badly balanced.

In tougher fights I'd almost say the game punishes you for not using an OP character. My Lucina and Chrom were powerful (I didn't grind them btw - I just used them all the time instead of wasting my time grinding low level units, since there's no point in using them over a few of your best characters that are already leveled) but they still died. Then I realized trying to get extra EXP for them was also a waste of time when all I needed was a Sorceror.

They say that no one really hates Fire Emblem more than Fire Emblem fans. XD

Seriously though, the games are usually known for being brutally difficult to 100%. This goes more for the OP than you (with all respect, I feel like your opinion is unlikely to change on the subject), but Awakening offered a lot of options so newcomers wouldn't be turned off, and the existence of certain classes, weapons, and gameplay options (partnering units usually decreases stats for the unit, not increases them) were introduced for that very reason. The game lets you build your army any way you want, so using the Sorceror+Nosferatu combo really isn't a necessity, even for the harder stages. It really just depends how you build your army, and how you plan your strategy several turns in advance. As a veteran who's completed Hector Hard Mode on Fire Emblem 7 with no casualties, hearing how this game can only be completed with certain units seems a bit silly in comparison.

Anyways, my stance on some of the unbalanced gameplay additions is essentially the same as the Super Guide in Mario/Donkey Kong, if it's not necessary, I don't feel the need to complain about it. 



NNID: Zephyr25 / PSN: Zephyr--25 / Switch: SW-4450-3680-7334