Yes.

Nintendo is all about making video games still interesting after Sooo many many years of video games being around.

But the other 2 surprise on their lackluster. But I suspected that their conference was going to end up exactly the kind of way they did.

I was still expecting even more from Nintendo. But the other 2 did exactly as much as I suspected.

Yes, Nintendo won.

Nintendo won, they had a great presentation with loads of incoming great games.

Of course there isn't a mathematical formula but one can use common sense and neutrality to clearly see Sony was poorer than Ubisoft. My "objective reasons" are subjectively chosen, I give you that. But I see it as common sense. Sure there may be some gamers that think DLCs worth as much as full games, but they should be a very small minority. Regarding games within the same conditions ruled by such common sense, neutrality makes you consider them equal in order to avoid being influenced by tastes. I can't say BloodBorne and Shape Up had a different relevance. They seem to be excellent games for their audiences (regardless in which one I am).

A game, no matter if you consider it good or bad (that is your personal opinion), has a fan base and you bet a 5-year wait produces a greater impact than a 2-year wait when the game finally comes. This is also common sense.

Is the common sense subjective? I think that's a philosophical question. And, to answer it philosophically, there is nothing in this world that is not subjective. Objectivity doesn't exist. "I only know that I know nothing".

Back to being a normal person again, you are trying to find a problem where there is no problem.