veritaz said:
QuintonMcLeod said:
veritaz said:
QuintonMcLeod said:
(I am not insinuating at all that their game will be even a fraction as big as Minecraft)
Sony's scouts are obviously aware of much more than you are. And in this case so am I. I've seen the steam early access sales. I've seen the competition awards. And I've seen the Beta reviews by big sites like Eurogamer praising the hell out of it.
But all of this ON TOPIC stuff aside, you are trolling Sony here and this is not the place to do it.
|
I'm not trying to put down or underestimate the value of indie developers. I'm pointing out that Sony, as a company, cannot afford to money-hat uncertain projects. The Playstation division is only profitable by just a few million. It's certainly not enough to help Sony as a whole - which is losing billions upon billions of dollars each year. If anything, the tiny profits gained from the Playstation division need to go toward helping Sony as a whole, don't you think?
|
You seem to point that out a lot, it's hard to miss. Nintendo hasn't posted a profit in a while either while doing just games and being much smaller than Sony.
|
Meanwhile, Nintendo is worth more than Sony while just doing games.
|
And yet Sony has assets worth way more than Nintendo. I don't know why you're trying to continue this, but I'm not surprised from your post history.
|
No they don't. This is why Nintendo is considered worth more than Sony. If Sony had assets worth more than Nintendo, then Sony would be worth more than Nintendo. I mean, that's how a company's worth is factored.
Wait... You didn't honestly think I was talking about which company had more money in the bank, were you? Sony has no money in the bank because they are in debt. That leaves Sony's assets (which they are already selling if you haven't noticed).
In the famous words of Satoru Iwata - "Please understand."