I agree. Xbone games are prospectively looking playing better than PS4.* Remember it is a marathon, not a sprint. 

*imo

This argument doesn't make sense anymore considering XBO was $450 in March with a free game bundled. Getting a PS4 with a new game will cost $460. The fact that PS4 won NPD in March should be proof enough that price isn't the only factor, just one of many. 

Why am I hypocritcal for something other people said years ago?

Offer a counter argument.  You truly believe current or imminent games are playing more of a role in PS4 sales than price, brand recognition and a series of good/bad PR by Sony/Microsoft respectively?

Its fine if you do - but don't just lump me in with diehard Xbox fanboys from years ago.

And you didn't liked any of the games you played so far on PS4?

The conversation was about diversity.  No one said anything about first parties.  Supporting second and third parties on your console are just as important.  And to that end, Zoo Tycoon/Fable Anniversary and World of Tanks are all examples of recent X360 support.

Some people disagree and that is fine.  But equating last generation to 5 and 6 is silly in my opinion.

Yes...other factors like PR, and brand name, and Microsoft's screw ups :P

Some targeted and temporary price cuts at certain retailers and bundling does not a true price cut make!  Even if it did, you said it yourself, one of many factors (though one of the more important ones!).

Op. If you've been paying attention, you'll see that I've been bashing Sony left and right for nothing but ports and throwing praise Microsoft and Nintendo's way, but, we're at the start of the gen and Sony always does this. For every system they own except for the Vita, Sony hasn't really done crap when it comes to supporting their consoles in the first two years. For the Vita, Sony actually really pushed out a lot of games for launch and launch window, but they didn't do much with it since except for ports and a game here and there.

Microsoft just like Sony has also had similar launches for their previous two consoles, the Xbox and the 360. With both consoles, Microsoft came out swinging. They funded the development and bought a lot of exclusives the first few years. Microsoft didn't secure, fund, or develop nearly as many exclusives after the first few years though. There were still exclusives, but the amount dropped way off.

The reason I've been bashing Sony isn't because games aren't going to come, because they will, but the company doesn't take the initiative and have these games well into development prior to the consoles release.

Imo, Microsoft is probably going to blow their wad within the first few years like they did the last two gens trying to get as many gamers as possible during that time and then first party support is going to slow to a crawl.

Infamous has been the standout - i loved 1 & 2 though.

Currently working through Child of Light which is good.

Even though your comment had it sound like 1st partie. But will pass through that and even tought X360 were heavily dependant on Shooters there isn't how to deny that they had variety (even if we need to include multiplats, because in the end for the player that won't matter much)... now what games one would preffer is a different topic, but would really be asinine to pretend that someone that just had a X360 wouldn't have diverse genres to play, even if for the sole reason that multiplats make more then 90% of the market or even more, and PS4 is now relying a lot in multiplats for diversity since Sony still haven't released much.

I do think MS have been lacking on support on X360 in the last 2 or 3 years (minus the end of 2013) but I don't think that is much of a problem when you already have a backlog... original Xbox were a lot harsher.

Since I preffer to buy my games cheaper, the beggining of a gen is a drag for me, bought just Infamous and loved it (but tought the story meh). Returning home I'll lend a lot of my friend's games and will have a little more fun. Hope you enjoy it, probably will take a lot of your time.