No he didnt, since the last two 'Trek' movies abandoned everything defining about Trek.

He butchered the canon and made an action movie with little in the way of substance. I usually like Abrams but he did wrong by Star Trek. His new Star Trek movies aren't horrible but they're a far cry from what makes Star Trek, Star Trek.  

I kind of agree wit him though. The new Trek was mostly about action and icons of the past. We need some moviemakers who put more time into quality dialogue, which involves a bit of humor and less tense moments.

Recent movies put a lot of emphasis on Epicness, and I think that makes them lose that charm that classics of the past used to have (Star Wars included).

Abrams and his team had every oppurtunity to please Trekkies, all he had to do was listen to the criticisms about the 1st movie, but instead he ignored them entirely. All it would have took to please us is a exploration plot that didn't butcher the canon. They were even considering an exploration plot at one point during it's development but then decided to do yet another summer thrills action movie, and by reviving Kahn no less, when they had previously said in interviews that they wouldn't revive Kahn because it was too risky. Exploration is what Star Trek is about first and foremost, not action. 

As for a TV series, they'll probably never make a new one that's set in the Prime Universe that follows the formula of the old shows now, we'd end up with some crap that the fans don't even want just like Stargate Universe. 

I'm not saying that. I understand what happened to the franchise because my favorite series was Enterprise.

But what I was considering valuable (dialogue, humor) is something I value in all movies, not just Star Trek shows/movies.

What I mean is that the franchise was revived in one way, I don't think it was the best, for me personally.

What is humor? One of my favorite movie series is Indiana Jones. If you watch it again and pay attention to the humor, you will see what I mean. It's certainly got action, and certainly has movie icons (after the 1st one), but it's very whitty and very funny all the while not being a comedy movie. The characters relate to each other in more than one way (angst) and are interesting to watch interact.

It's really not that vague when you pay attention to these things in movies.

"... or you make movies that aren't sucessful"

Nem, you seem to think the previous Star Trek movies were total flops or something. Star Trek 4, which is my favorite Star Trek movie btw, made $133 million on a $21 million dollar budget, that's a success by any measure, especially once adjusted for inflation into modern dollars (when adjusted for inflation it made more than Abram's "Into Darkness" domestically).