|
Shinobi-san said:
In my opinion the new Kinect could have done wonders. But there's no software for it.
This is the biggest issue i have with MS's X1 launch. They are investing a lot in Kinect yet they didnt have any software for it? And apart from one or two games now they still dont have the software to sell the device.
|
Agreed, that part of MS's XB1 launch made no sense. MS PR made a big deal about the improved capability of the new Kinect, mentioned that the XB1's lower specs were in part mitigated by the improved immersion thanks to the new kinect, yet when it released there is nothing to sell it other than the fact the UI needs it. Sony has shown that you don't need the expense of the Kinect hardware to handle voice commands and face recognition, the two things that many XB1 fans crow about. MS could have done the same with the original Kinect hardware without all the additional investment, or a simple web camera.
You can tell MS don't really believe in Kinect through their constant defence of the XB1's specs and performance in cross-platform games. If MS really believed that Kinect provided a better gaming experience then they wouldn't need to keep defending the XB1's performance in these games because Kinect would make up for the lower resolution in gaming immersion, but they aren't doing that. MS needs to start actively selling the Kinect on its merits if it wants people to pay extra for it, and one Kinect game (Rivals) isn't going to cut it, it needs to be heavily used in all their first party games, otherwise it'll just end up like the Wii U's gamepad, an arguably unappealing and expensive accessory that just puts a barrier on entry to an otherwise fine gaming system.