By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - First party devs should be more open to bringing games to PC

If the First brings games to PC then its the end of Consoles and by that end of gaming. Its the consoles manufacturers who are investing huge on gaming than the PC(its just pushing Indies and F2P which doesn't push GPU as well). Right now PC is not making the money just like Consoles on a newly released game unless if the game is only Some kind of sale for very cheap which is not the AAA and AA developers wants to be the future. Consoles about gaming and dedicated experiences. This will never happen and if it does then its good bye to Consoles and to AAA gaming future as well.



GAMING is not about spending hours to pass/waste our time just for fun,

its a Feeling/Experience about a VIRTUAL WORLD we can never be in real, and realizing some of our dreams (also creating new ones).

So, Feel Emotions, Experience Adventure/Action, Challenge Game, Solve puzzles and Have fun.

PlayStation is about all-round "New experiences" using new IP's to provide great diversity for everyone.

Xbox is always about Online and Shooting.

Nintendo is always about Fun games and milking IP's.

Around the Network

This is why I dislike pc gamers, always jealous and port begging.



Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
lt_dan_27 said:
I don't care one way or the other. I think it's best for the consumer when something is an open platform though. So maybe.

openplatform isn't always best for the consumer, freedom in some places is restricting in other.


I'm not saying you're necessarily wrong, but how could this really hurt us?



lt_dan_27 said:
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
lt_dan_27 said:
I don't care one way or the other. I think it's best for the consumer when something is an open platform though. So maybe.

openplatform isn't always best for the consumer, freedom in some places is restricting in other.


I'm not saying you're necessarily wrong, but how could this really hurt us?

open platform reduces the incentive for companies to invest especially in the entertainment industry which gaming is a part of. 

Even worse yet, as gaming is a hobby rather than a neccesity, its unlikely that any company would replace what the console industry without the incentive of a closed platform. We would see significant downsizing across the board. And lower quality games are bad for the consumer.

In short terms, freedom for consumers limits what some companies can reasonably invest to push the industry further. 



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
lt_dan_27 said:
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
lt_dan_27 said:
I don't care one way or the other. I think it's best for the consumer when something is an open platform though. So maybe.

openplatform isn't always best for the consumer, freedom in some places is restricting in other.


I'm not saying you're necessarily wrong, but how could this really hurt us?

open platform reduces the incentive for companies to invest especially in the entertainment industry which gaming is a part of. 

Even worse yet, as gaming is a hobby rather than a neccesity, its unlikely that any company would replace what the console industry without the incentive of a closed platform. We would see significant downsizing across the board. And lower quality games are bad for the consumer.

In short terms, freedom for consumers limits what some companies can reasonably invest to push the industry further.

Movies used to be a closed platform. There would still be incentive to invest, considering they would still make money off of the games sold, now on both platforms. Over all, game sales would probably increase, but there might be a decrease in console sales I suppose. Considering people would now only buy one home console. 



Around the Network

This makes no sense. You think they give a shit if it will look or play better? First party games are created to sell the system they were created on.