By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Xbox One and Titanfall bundle makes the Microsoft game console a better deal than the PS4

TheBlackNaruto said:

Atually no consumers more so determine what is most affordable/popular/accessible not what is the most high quality product. A Chey cobalt sells more than a Bentley but it is widely known that a Bentley is a higher quality car. A McDs burger sales more than a Lobster or Steak but again the Lobster/Steak is of higher quality than the McDs burger. Does that take anything away fromt he sales though no...because the McDs burger is more affordable and accessible. Does it take anything away from the Chevy Cobalt no because again to the AVERAGE consumer the Cobalt is more affordable and accessible....not of higher quality.

But I see your point and what you are trying to say/do...hence the reason I said you sir....are good lol

Then how is quality defined ? Isn't it more important to know what your customers think about the product rather than the qualities of your own product ? 



Around the Network

@fatslob-:O

Quality can not be truly defined. To many opinions.



rolltide101x said:
@fatslob-:O

Quality can not be truly defined. To many opinions.

Then the term "quality" has no meaning then ... 



Its a pretty good deal now at $450 with titanfall, too bad we don't have it here in Canada but with the price hike for the PS4 its similar, still too expensive for me.



With the Xbox One system software and Kinect it has always been a better value.



Its libraries that sell systems not a single game.

Around the Network

@fatslob-:O

It does in a sense and it does not in a sense.

Nobody will argue that a steak is not higher quality than a hamburger but there are some who will say the PS4 is higher quality than the One and that the One is higher quality than the PS4.

Steak>Hamburger is a fact
PS4>One is more of an opinion



Wow. This thread.



rolltide101x said:
@fatslob-:O

It does in a sense and it does not in a sense.

Nobody will argue that a steak is not higher quality than a hamburger but there are some who will say the PS4 is higher quality than the One and that the One is higher quality than the PS4.

Steak>Hamburger is a fact
PS4>One is more of an opinion

What people argue is meaningless. What matters most is their eating habits ... 

Once again you fail to prove that their is bounds to quality when it is not defined by the market. 



fatslob-:O said:
TheBlackNaruto said:

Atually no consumers more so determine what is most affordable/popular/accessible not what is the most high quality product. A Chey cobalt sells more than a Bentley but it is widely known that a Bentley is a higher quality car. A McDs burger sales more than a Lobster or Steak but again the Lobster/Steak is of higher quality than the McDs burger. Does that take anything away fromt he sales though no...because the McDs burger is more affordable and accessible. Does it take anything away from the Chevy Cobalt no because again to the AVERAGE consumer the Cobalt is more affordable and accessible....not of higher quality.

But I see your point and what you are trying to say/do...hence the reason I said you sir....are good lol

Then how is quality defined ? Isn't it more important to know what your customers think about the product rather than the qualities of your own product ? 

Quality is defined as a high level of excellnce or value if I am not mistaken. And yes what consumers think about your product is very imoprtant even with that the AVERAGE consumer would still feel that just for reference a Bugatti is of higher quality than a Toyota Corolla even though they would be driving the Corolla. Or are you telling me that if you had a choice between a Nissan Versa and a Lamborghini that you would take the Nissan Versa because it seels more? That's why consumers mostly determine with what they purchase what is most affordable/accessible/popular. The sales debate has so many different directions that it is crazy lol. But you again have a very valid point none the less in your perspective...



The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...

PSN: StlUzumaki23

fatslob-:O said:
BMaker11 said:

So I guess it's better than Grand Theft Auto 3? Halo: CE? Zelda: OoT? Uncharted 2? GoldenEye 007? Tony Hawk 2? BioShock 1? MGS3? I mean, all these games are considered some of the best of all time. But sales = quality, right? None of them came close to Wii Fit's sales. So whatever echelon the above games are on, Wii Fit is far, far above them.

Ofcourse it's better than those games, period ... There is just no argument. WII Fit was also one of the reasons for selling tons of balance boards. If it wasn't one of the best quality games of all time then why did it make Nintendo sooo much money ?