I don't even own an Xbone. I just don't see the big deal about 720p vs 1080p.

How so many people get into debates about graphical differences amazes me. I, being a Nintendo fan, have long ago stopped caring more about graphics than I do gameplay and innovation. If Nintendo never released a new console and just continued to add games to the Wii u and software enhancements and peripherals and never another console with better graphics that would be fine with me. I'm content with modern graphics, I don't need more andfrankly Nintendo is more about art style than graphics anyway so new hardware doesn't even really make there games look that much better than precious gen games.

Did you stop reading after one sentence I posted? And first off, everyone knew that the mp wasn't 60 fps. It was just unlocked and was usuaually in the ballpark of 60fps. Here's the guerrilla response, 

http://bgr.com/2014/03/11/killzone-shadow-fall-1080p-response/

The reason people made such a big deal out of it was because they knew they could. If a problem isn't fixed seconds after what happens, that's what they'll believe. I bet if there were a similar thing with xbox games xbox fans would praise MS for their enginuity... oh wait,, they did. It's called tiled resources. They're not exactly the same at all, but they're both similar hat tricks. And I'm not saying either are bad, I'm saying the double standard annoys me. Would I rather have "full" 1080p? Yes, but you gotta do what you gotta do. 

Is knack 1080p? I Played it at jb hifi, and I honestly could not see the resolution difference between super mario 3d and knack,

Besides, I think performance matters more - i'd rather have 720p with a stable framerate and no technical bugs (like 3D world, DKC: TF), then a game with 1080p and shitty performance. Just my opinion.

Will you people just get over yourselves?!  1080p should be the new standard for christ sakes.  Otherwise go play your PS2 because I am enjoying the present day and don't feel like being dragged down with you...

Since we're allowed to post 'questionable' opinions in here. Here goes!

All games should be locked to 24fps as the human eye can't handle more than that :^)

While I find it jarring to go back to watching anything on old tube SDTVs, the "jump" from 720p/1080i HD (which is what 95% of HD television programs broadcast in) to 1080p is barely noticeable. Not to mention that most console games including many gen 8 games thus far aren't native 1080p, so it hardly makes a difference if your display is 1080p or not.

no its not horrible, and its fine when not displaying on a native 1080p TV... 

ACTUALLY... The Human eye can discern more than that.

Remember, the Human eye does not see in terms of "framerates" anyway.

Movies are typically displayed at 24fps and they usually seem perfectly smooth.
However, there are some tricks that allows that to happen, namely, there is blurring between two frames so the transition doesn't look all that severe between frame transitions.
The minimum amount of "fps" that can seem perfectly smooth is roughly 18fps with movies... Try playing Call of Duty with 18fps, games generally don't blur frame transitions.

People, can and do notice the difference between 60fps and 120fps on a 120hz panel, just like how you can tell the difference between 30fps and 60fps on a 60hz panel.

In regards to resolution, that's slightly different.
The human eye can only discern a set number of pixels depending on pixel size and distance, have a 720P monitor? Just sit back farther, it would then have the same amount of perceived pixels as a higher pixel density panel that you would sit closer to.

There isn't any big deal, both are horrible last-decade sub-1440P. xD

Lol.

Thank you for posting that, because I was afraid some people would agree with what I had posted.