I cant understand why ppl expect an infamous game to not play like Infamous, Id be extremelly pissed if this didnt play like Infamous 1 and 2 cause I love both those games. Im currently playing Dark Souls 2 and guess what it plays exactly like Dark Souls 1 and Demons Souls and I dindt see 1 reviewer complaining...

good job, you can do negative quotes from negative reviews. Anyone that thought higher than 90 for this was off. I was guessing low to mid 80's but hoping for 90.

Yeah obviously you do not really see my post too often. I get on Sony/ MS/Nin all the same for childish things. Matter of fact I just recently in the stock topic Kowen posted said I get why Sony fans get a bad rep because of one or two in there just derailing the thread for no reason. Didn't see you say anything about that? But of course not on that would look like I don't just play one side of the field. But hey it's cool to just make an assumption just because someone fan they are the same as others who do silly stull...VGC logic I guess...

I have to say I had to chuckle a bit at this quote from the games(tm) review:

"This is a marked improvement on its predecessors, both narratively and gameplay-wise, and it’s a huge amount of fun to play from start to finish. However, without trying to sound like a dick, it’s a game much like its protagonist: absorbing until you come into contact with something more appealing."

Now Infamous 1 & 2 got a 7/10 from them, what does Infamous SS get? A 7/10 of course :D

Why does it have to retain an about 80 meta for you to purchase the game? Have you played any of the other Infamous games? Are you a fan of the series if so? Did you like the other games? I am asking because I don't know what idfference say 78 or 80 will make on you buying the game. I always wonder because I see people say that anything below 80 is bad when some of the best games never rate about 80....maybe it's just me.

No it's not just you, some people are just that autistic

The first next gen gameplay will be the bullet time mode in an FPS in which you literally get shot and cant play the game anymore.

#nextgengameplay

So it looks like it's reviewing around the same as the first 2, I guessed between 80-85 for meta. You could just tell by the gameplay that not much had changed, If you're an infamous fan then you'll love it, if you're not then there isn't much to see here.

I was fully kidding. I'll answer your questions though: I was kidding, yes, not especially but this looks different, no.

Will buy it, but not right now.

Em, seems like you misunderstood what I was saying. I was trying to back you up. That's all. I made no assumptions about you. I was only referring to the foodguy having a signature which only fuels the console wars (and by the sounds of it he wants to make it more flamebait). It's like me going to an ms game thread which mentions that the game doesn't run in 1080p and go "oh, another game to put in my sig" while having a signature of angry ms fans looking at the list of xbo games with lower than 1080p resolution. As far as I'm concerned neither fanbase deserves a worse bad rep than the other. People derail threads from both fanbases.