Normchacho said: GribbleGrunger said: Very odd conclusion: I just saw this in the video, what the hell is that?

That's pop in on the X1 version they seemed to overlook. I'm calling foul on this one. Oh well, another site struck off my 'to trust' list.

The never mentioned the lack of POM on the X1 version either:

Let's wait for more well made games maybe.

Looks to me like the xbox one version stalled for a while on loading the baked lightmap, a few seconds after the PS4 version stalled on loading the texture map, in the engine both resources are stored in the exact same way.

UE3 has always had these sorts of streaming issues, even on high end pcs without very specific hardware sets and driver versions.

With that in consideration its pretty obvious that both "next gen" console versions are shitty regardless, sub 30fps for this sort of game is a slap in the face of buyers.

Damn, must be biased.

I for one am not really ready to just jump up and call bias honestly. This seems more like just a poorly done/rushed assesment than all out favoritism.

This is why I don't always take DF's verdicts as the best analysis of games.

Not necessary, everyone can make a mistake, rushed assesment on a game nobody cares.

So they did their entire comparison with the not loaded into the ps4? They loaded it into the x1 first, then after that was done did an on the fly comparison? Yeah, ok. That doesn't at all sound like a load of bs.

DF gave the nod to the bone? noo00 they are fanboys, throw out everything they ever said including all the favorable ps4 comparisons.

Some are sure picky with what they choose to support.

Exactly. If they can't be trusted here, then don't use their word for anything. Well said too talls.