X1 has faster texture fetching due to eSRAM so I'm not one bit surprised about it. Other than that, all I read was blahblahblah PC master race blahblahblah anyways.

Well, if DF didn't fully install the game on PS4...

Very odd conclusion:

Unlikely this has to do with eSRAM.

lol

another clueless dude.

PS4 uses trilinear filtering and xbone use AF

this has nothing to do with hardware.

same thing happened with Strider

ever since resolutiongate: "whatever guys its about the gameplay not the graphics, blah blah!"
xbox one pulls ahead under resolvable circumstances and suddenly its important again.

Gotta love it.

I don't really get the conclusion...The PS4 version has a better framerate, a higher resolution, and better texturing. But the Xbox One version is better because...the PS4 version has some texture pop in during cutscenes? Which actually may or may not be a mistake by DF...

Ok I guess,

Can someone explain to me why is it that when you pick three comparison points and 2 are won by one console , that console isn't the superior version?

Also why do screenshots from actual owners look better than DF analysis?

I just don't understand why would anyone defend and not question the article when there's clear inconsistencies.

GribbleGrunger said: Very odd conclusion:

I just saw this in the video, what the hell is that?

DF  fanboyism is kinda sad.

they didnt even mention the AA and the pop-in on XBONE version

anyway this game looks horrible