have we any confirmation on actual textures in comparison to alpha build, it was claimed only 25% was used?

You didn't understand me. All I was saying: when you have xbox one you get games with great gameplay and very good graphics. With ps3/x360 you get great gameplay and slightly worse graphics and similar resolution. PS4 gives you games with great gameplay and great graphics.

If you think that VGC was some utopian forum before, then yes, maybe delusion is the word. I don't know how long you were lurking before, but your profile says you joined in 2012. I've been around since mid 2007 and joined in early 2008. And it was ugly for PS fans. I even just did a random web archive of this site for mid 2008 and right on the "Hot Topics" sections was a thread about how KZ2 was generic and won't live up to the hype, right alongside another thread about how the PS3 version of GTAIV was worse and the 360 version was "definitive" (due to the episodic content).

You can pretend that it was all candy and rainbows, but to sit and deny statements from people who have been on this site longer than you and to ignore the consensus of many posters saying things like "shoe is on the other foot now", "they can dish it out but can't take it", "now you know how it felt last gen", etc....people aren't just fabricating memories and emotions. If it never happened before, a plethora of people wouldn't have the thought in their head that "the roles have reversed"

You can pretend that you've dropped the mic after saying something really compelling (feel free to keep discussing, I've said all I need to say), but you're really just cutting and running from the fact that you are demonstrably wrong in this particular assertion

Since the dev says "frame rate is king" and its struggling to hold 60fps at 792P, they should shoot for 768P. At least that an actual resolution that used to be used in some of the first HDTV. ;)

Better than 720p.....

All I have seen about the frame rate is that it drops when entering Titans. But DF didn't say by how much and even said you won't even notice in most situations.

I don't think any of the CoD games really held a true constant 60fps either, but were almost always at 54+.

Your entitled to your opinion bud, but no lol:

-Killzone Shadow Fall is 60FPS in 1080p with way more automated companion bots.  It looks WAY better than Killzone 3.  Is it because of Textures, Resolution, framerate, and particle effects?  DUH!  What else could be measured?  

-BF4 is insanily more detailed in the ways I just mentioned, AND it is 64 player vs 24.  That is a crazy huge difference.  It would be like saying BF2 on PS2 was as good as the PC version.  Not.  Even.  Close.

-AC4's viewdistance is magnitudes longer, and again all of the other stuff (The framerate is still a more consistant 30).

Do you own a PS4 or enthusiast PC?

Source can look absolutily stunning.  Play portal 2 maxed out on PC...

I have! on 1080p/60fps on my old 550Ti. My point wasn't Source not visually stunning, but that XOne can't run it maxed per se. Maybe 'without loss of generality'doesn't apply here since someone pointed out it can be a major overhauled Source. I would hope so.

"DUH!  What else could be measured?"

And that's the thing, you originally said Titanfall looks like a last gen game. However, the 360 version will not look as polished. The X1 version will likely have the smoother frame rate, sharper textures, better lighting, less pop up, etc.

No, I don't own a PS4 and my PC isn't great. Not that it matters.

Except Titanfall has low textures, resolution, player count, nearly no physics or particle effects, and the framerate can't even keep a solid 60.  See the difference?

So you don't have a PS4 or powerful gaming PC.  So you don't even know the difference.  Hey I'm sure that gif in your signiture makes you feel better about yourself though!