Mr Puggsly said:
Captain_Tom said:
Mr Puggsly said:
I repeat, "most significant difference we're seeing in graphics are often resolution, textures, frame rate, lighting effects, less pop up, etc."
AC4 does not look much different on 8th gen and still runs at 30 fps. I've played BF4 thoroughly on PS3 and X1, the biggest differences are noted above.
All the exclusives you mentioned could get decent ports on 7th gen consoles. BF4 is proof of that, they just wouldn't look as polished.
|
Your entitled to your opinion bud, but no lol:
-Killzone Shadow Fall is 60FPS in 1080p with way more automated companion bots. It looks WAY better than Killzone 3. Is it because of Textures, Resolution, framerate, and particle effects? DUH! What else could be measured?
-BF4 is insanily more detailed in the ways I just mentioned, AND it is 64 player vs 24. That is a crazy huge difference. It would be like saying BF2 on PS2 was as good as the PC version. Not. Even. Close.
-AC4's viewdistance is magnitudes longer, and again all of the other stuff (The framerate is still a more consistant 30).
Do you own a PS4 or enthusiast PC?
|
"DUH! What else could be measured?"
And that's the thing, you originally said Titanfall looks like a last gen game. However, the 360 version will not look as polished. The X1 version will likely have the smoother frame rate, sharper textures, better lighting, less pop up, etc.
No, I don't own a PS4 and my PC isn't great. Not that it matters.
|
Except Titanfall has low textures, resolution, player count, nearly no physics or particle effects, and the framerate can't even keep a solid 60. See the difference?
So you don't have a PS4 or powerful gaming PC. So you don't even know the difference. Hey I'm sure that gif in your signiture makes you feel better about yourself though!
