So, about that QoL platafform, there a really few details about its, but there is some:
- Can be used to health, education, and others.
- "Non-Wearable"
- Could comunicate with another N plattaforms
I was thinking about it, then i remenber the one thing that i saw near wiiu launch. A patent that nintendo registered, but never used. Here it is:
Details about the patent:
- "remotely controlled mobile device control system"
- Wiimote placed within a "remote controlled toy"
- used in conjunction with a game console
So nintendo is the actual company that made life to "I, Robot", huh...(or maybe more like "Bicentennial Man"?)
Just a theory, ok? We areadly saw things more ridiculous, rigth? RIGTH?
UPDATE: since a person like robot would be too expensive, maybe its something simple and smaller, like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zF2RI0f_PhE
But instead of looking like a dog, could look like some pokemon.
Why i think that? Because fit the idea of QoL pretty well. Remenber, will be "non-wearable", yet will not be limited to something in your home, so need to be something that you can bring along to you wherever you go. They also mentioned that won't need a companion app on smartphones to track your progress, and that could be used in conjuction with other games.
They also registered another patent for QOL this year that cites clothes, eletronic devices: http://nintendoeverything.com/nintendo-trademarks-qol-japan/. I think that those clothes could be actually skins for different pokemons. Like, you have skin for a eve, another for a growlith, another for a fennekin, etc. They could even sell acessories for then.
Last week, there was a rumor that nitenndo acquired a technology for 100 million US dollars, but that was not gaming related. Could be the thecnology to produce these "toys".
I know that sound crazy that nintendo is making "actual pokemons", but fits so well. Myamoto said that would be something fun. The thecnology to do this alreadly exist, the final product could be very cheap(the dog in that video costs less than US$100). Would a be a market taht nobody invested in reality, and nintendo has a killer IP for win this.
"Hardware design isn’t about making the most powerful thing you can.
Today most hardware design is left to other companies, but when you make hardware without taking into account the needs of the eventual software developers, you end up with bloated hardware full of pointless excess. From the outset one must consider design from both a hardware and software perspective."
Gunpei Yoko
