Well yeah, no shit it doesn't add hat much to the game. Anyone that thinks otherwise is plain dumb.
Well yeah, no shit it doesn't add hat much to the game. Anyone that thinks otherwise is plain dumb.
MonstaTruk said:
Wow. Are you sure? That second image is sharper than the PC! :o |
Nothing against the quality of the ps4 version, but I like her face more in the PC and ps3 versions. Her eyes have been widened, and face a little more filled in the ps4 version.
MonstaTruk said:
Wow. Are you sure? That second image is sharper than the PC! :o |
Sharpness doesn't necessarily mean anything. You've got to look at the fine deatil (e.g. the hair effects). And a more matte, soft finish is often more pleasing to the eye. I know over all I prefer the bottom image.
“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix
selnor1983 said:
|
Do you even understand what we are talking about in this thread(s)?
PS4 version is by default locked at 60fps! And it apparently sustains 60fps quite well with occassionnal dips on some demanding scenes (by the real previews, not vgchartz guesses).
What Digital foundry will tell us is the average gap of framerate between the 2 versions. But as we already know that for BF4, even with 44% more pixels on PS4 does push on average 10fps more than X1 hence 20% (from 45fps to 55fps average)+ 44% from resolution up equals a 72% delta (1.2 * 1.44 = 1.72 in fact not 20 + 40). PS4 is in average 72% more powerfull than X1 in BF4, that's a mathematical fact, no question of denying it. But it depends of the game of course and assets, resolution or framerate etc.
So it means normally DF wil tell us a roughly 21-25FPS constant gap between the 2 versions (35fps * 1.72 = 60.2fps, Surprise!). That's roughly what I am expecting. Theorically of course, one can never know.
Meaning when PS4 is constant 60fps, the game on X1 is at 35fps, that's almost a perfect 72% difference (from 35 to 60).
When PS4 dips at 45FPS, the game on X1 dips at 26fps etc. The 10fps gap with BF4 was surprisingly constant on the DF video no reason it wouldn't be constant with Tomb raider.
But as the 2 versions are made by 2 different developers,those numbers (framerate average gap) may be quite different than my 21-25FPS theorical gap. I suspect it may be lower like 15-20fps with less dips on X1 if they specifically optimized for it too avoid to many sub-30fps drops (yes X1 version will certainly have them!).
binary solo said:
Sharpness doesn't necessarily mean anything. You've got to look at the fine deatil (e.g. the hair effects). And a more matte, soft finish is often more pleasing to the eye. I know over all I prefer the bottom image. |
ok she got a new hairdresser... What about the catastrophic sharpener on the XBox one, activated? I'd love to see the XBox One pictures as well.
PS4 top (sharp), PC bottom (blurry)
Nsanity and Selnor are on fire today!
Nsanity said: |
Wow. The PC version still looks much nicer. I'm assuming those are max settings, but is there any info on what kind of system its running on and the framerate?
waiting for DF analysis could be a case similar to bf4 and cod ghost
Play Me
CGI-Quality said:
...
|
everybody should listen this guy
”The environment where PlayStation wins is best for this industry” (Jack Tretton, 2009)