By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Lets clear up the rubbish on this site surrounding Titanfall.

ratchet426 said:
TimCliveroller said:
czecherychestnut said:
TimCliveroller said:
 

Dear contributor, it is really sad to see such a misinformed opinion. I hope for the sake / sanity of computer science that you do not have any aspirations towards graduating such a discipline. Your lack of complete understanding of concepts such as latency, bandwith or deferred processing gives me a pessimistic feel about technical skills of people stating facts on conversational panoramas. Please do not base your statements on fantasy literature as this tends (in the long run) to make individuals belive in their own imaginary science.

P.S. As a teacher, mentor and guide - I am always willing to help people in positions similar to yours. Feel free to contact me whenever you have questions or you are puzzled by computer science intricacies.


It would be much easier to believe you if you actually highlighted why ratchet426 is wrong rather than just climbing up on your mighty pedestal and tut-tutting his supposed inferior understanding. I'm sure many people on this forum including myself would love you to share your apparent wisdom and knowledge on this topic and save us from ignorance, so please tell us why exactly ratchet426 is wrong and provide us with the correct information, with supporting evidence if you would. 

Although I do not feel myself obliged to give anyone a detailed answer (until asked directly, in a respectful, knowledge seeking manner) I will tell you this: things do not change in the eyes of the ignorant even if coercion is the mother of all education. Maybe I make a fool of myself in the blind eyes of fools, but then again ... why should they deserve to be enlightened when all they seek is fantasy. I do however reject all forms of distasteful sarcasm.

As a sign of ultimate kindness I do give you a tip: (in such a multiplayer scenario) where is the place in which all important information is gathered and thus processed? where is the place where real decisions are made?


TimCliveroller-

Well I got to hand it to you. You managed to be a clueless, pompus @ss AND wildly entertaining at the same time! Bravo! (oh and hey, thanks for posting TWICE, genius)

So not only do you lay in with an illogical, condescending tone, when czech asks you to elaborate on your claims you just provide a non-response line of insane drivel. Oh, you don't feel "obliged" to give anyone a detailed answer. Well, then maybe you should consider not making asinine statements that you can't back up.

p.s. Thanks for the kind offer to assist with computer science "intricacies" -  but already have my Masters degree in Computer Science. How 'bout you?

 


Dear Masters degree holder, 

this will be my last post covering our short disputation (as I do not endorse topic digression). I do find some of your words quite agressive masking without a doubt signs of defensive behaviour from a mediocre knowledge base. As I wasn't very enthusiastic towards advocating basic computer science knowledge to ungrateful individuals, I came unto a few thoughtful written posts sharing the common sense perspective. I see that when confronted with hard, factual evidence - ignorance comes as the best solution serving your purpose. Again, I find people trying to disseminate this basic type of knowledge quite naive as they are faced with the same said ignorance.

As for the acandemic degree, I am completely indignant when I see such a difference in educational requirements and standards. I am completely consternated when I see people lacking in value and merit and still, they hold such degrees. This comes from an educator who is reponsible for awarding such degrees (obviously not skinny evaluated as is your case).

Moderated,

-Mr Khan



Ex Graphics Whore.

Around the Network

OP thought it was a good idea to create a thread about spreading FUD about titanfall, by spreading his own FUD? LOL



S.T.A.G.E. said:
JerCotter7 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
JerCotter7 said:

For the last few weeks I always write a reply, then read over it before posting it. 9 times out of 10 I just delete the reply because it's not worth it. A lot more people should do the same. 

 

OT: whens the last time MS even said cloud? Seems to me like MS is trying to distance itself somewhat from the whole cloud means 5 billion percent extra toasting ability. To me it seems more like the fans are keeping it alive now?

If every multiplayer match on titanfall has part of this "campaign" that sounds annoying as fuck. I'm not really keeping up with the game so just going by what the OP posted. I'd rather buy the game with as little knowledge about it as possible.

All NPC's are bots so TF AI are bots.


Microsoft has invested far more into cloud technology than Sony. There is no way they are turning their back on it. Just because Sony announced something doesn't mean MS doesn't have something up their sleeve for later.


Of course they will still invest in the cloud. Every major company has. But they seemed to have stopped using it as a PR stunt. I may just not be following whats happening close enough. I get bored of console war crap fairly quckly.


The whole Microsoft system designed around the Xbox One is designed around the cloud. We dont know exactly what we're going to get until they update it. All we know about Sony is their cloud is used for saving and streaming.

There will be no difference in online gaming this gen between x1 and ps4, just like there was not with ps3 and 360. Pure MS marketing FUD.



TimCliveroller said:
ratchet426 said:
TimCliveroller said:
czecherychestnut said:
TimCliveroller said:
 

Dear contributor, it is really sad to see such a misinformed opinion. I hope for the sake / sanity of computer science that you do not have any aspirations towards graduating such a discipline. Your lack of complete understanding of concepts such as latency, bandwith or deferred processing gives me a pessimistic feel about technical skills of people stating facts on conversational panoramas. Please do not base your statements on fantasy literature as this tends (in the long run) to make individuals belive in their own imaginary science.

P.S. As a teacher, mentor and guide - I am always willing to help people in positions similar to yours. Feel free to contact me whenever you have questions or you are puzzled by computer science intricacies.


It would be much easier to believe you if you actually highlighted why ratchet426 is wrong rather than just climbing up on your mighty pedestal and tut-tutting his supposed inferior understanding. I'm sure many people on this forum including myself would love you to share your apparent wisdom and knowledge on this topic and save us from ignorance, so please tell us why exactly ratchet426 is wrong and provide us with the correct information, with supporting evidence if you would. 

Although I do not feel myself obliged to give anyone a detailed answer (until asked directly, in a respectful, knowledge seeking manner) I will tell you this: things do not change in the eyes of the ignorant even if coercion is the mother of all education. Maybe I make a fool of myself in the blind eyes of fools, but then again ... why should they deserve to be enlightened when all they seek is fantasy. I do however reject all forms of distasteful sarcasm.

As a sign of ultimate kindness I do give you a tip: (in such a multiplayer scenario) where is the place in which all important information is gathered and thus processed? where is the place where real decisions are made?


TimCliveroller-

Well I got to hand it to you. You managed to be a clueless, pompus @ss AND wildly entertaining at the same time! Bravo! (oh and hey, thanks for posting TWICE, genius)

So not only do you lay in with an illogical, condescending tone, when czech asks you to elaborate on your claims you just provide a non-response line of insane drivel. Oh, you don't feel "obliged" to give anyone a detailed answer. Well, then maybe you should consider not making asinine statements that you can't back up.

p.s. Thanks for the kind offer to assist with computer science "intricacies" -  but already have my Masters degree in Computer Science. How 'bout you?

 


Dear Masters degree holder, 

this will be my last post covering our short disputation (as I do not endorse topic digression). I do find some of your words quite agressive masking without a doubt signs of defensive behaviour from a mediocre knowledge base. As I wasn't very enthusiastic towards advocating basic computer science knowledge to ungrateful individuals, I came unto a few thoughtful written posts sharing the common sense perspective. I see that when confronted with hard, factual evidence - ignorance comes as the best solution serving your purpose. Again, I find people trying to disseminate this basic type of knowledge quite naive as they are faced with the same said ignorance.

As for the acandemic degree, I am completely indignant when I see such a difference in educational requirements and standards. I am completely consternated when I see people lacking in value and merit and still, they hold such degrees. This comes from an educator who is reponsible for awarding such degrees (obviously not skinny evaluated as is your case).


And another rambling non-response. 

Word of advice - you should probably put down the pocket Thesaurus. You aren't impressing anyone with your "intellectual" language, you're just proving what a pompus d**che you are.



ratchet426 said:
TimCliveroller said:
ratchet426 said:


TimCliveroller-

Well I got to hand it to you. You managed to be a clueless, pompus @ss AND wildly entertaining at the same time! Bravo! (oh and hey, thanks for posting TWICE, genius)

So not only do you lay in with an illogical, condescending tone, when czech asks you to elaborate on your claims you just provide a non-response line of insane drivel. Oh, you don't feel "obliged" to give anyone a detailed answer. Well, then maybe you should consider not making asinine statements that you can't back up.

p.s. Thanks for the kind offer to assist with computer science "intricacies" -  but already have my Masters degree in Computer Science. How 'bout you?

 


Dear Masters degree holder, 

this will be my last post covering our short disputation (as I do not endorse topic digression). I do find some of your words quite agressive masking without a doubt signs of defensive behaviour from a mediocre knowledge base. As I wasn't very enthusiastic towards advocating basic computer science knowledge to ungrateful individuals, I came unto a few thoughtful written posts sharing the common sense perspective. I see that when confronted with hard, factual evidence - ignorance comes as the best solution serving your purpose. Again, I find people trying to disseminate this basic type of knowledge quite naive as they are faced with the same said ignorance.

As for the acandemic degree, I am completely indignant when I see such a difference in educational requirements and standards. I am completely consternated when I see people lacking in value and merit and still, they hold such degrees. This comes from an educator who is reponsible for awarding such degrees (obviously not skinny evaluated as is your case).


And another rambling non-response. 

Word of advice - you should probably put down the pocket Thesaurus. You aren't impressing anyone with your "intellectual" language, you're just proving what a pompus d**che you are.


I was reading his last post and was just thinking the same. Literally picture this guy was reading a thesaurus on a bus and it stopped suddenly and he ended up swallowing the whole thing, is now coughing it up page by page in place of any actual substance about the matter at hand. You've not actually put forwards any of your own thoughts here Tim btw, just jabs and insults towards users for their views and intellects wrapped up in a scrabble winners cardigan.

This whole thread is kinda dead tho, Selnors OP is based on some info from almost 8/9 months ago a lot of which has been debunked as the game gets ready to roll out and I mean the 10 pages of arguing that the AI characters you fight with/against are not bots

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_game_bot

I mean.... their AI is dynamic yes, but while they're running from a machine they're bots, be that the console under your TV or a server cloud 2 countries away.

Titanfall is going to be a gigantic game tho, it's going to launch and have a whole load of haters complaining about it for one reason or the other but it's definately going to sell a whole load, people still rocking out the 360 will buy tons of it in appreciation of EA/MS showing love to their system and how their 7 year old hardware will still be delivering great experiences and those who have splashed out on an X1 will want it as their first Huge 3rd party exclusive to brag about and rightly so.

@Selnor tho - I'd say if you're annoyed by the "rubbish" people are talking about the game now, when it's closer to launching you should probably get some vallium for yourself man :D you know as soon as the first youtuber experiences a glitch it will be on every site that the game was unplayable at launch haha.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

Around the Network
TimCliveroller said:
ratchet426 said:
TimCliveroller said:

It would be much easier to believe you if you actually highlighted why ratchet426 is wrong rather than just climbing up on your mighty pedestal and tut-tutting his supposed inferior understanding. I'm sure many people on this forum including myself would love you to share your apparent wisdom and knowledge on this topic and save us from ignorance, so please tell us why exactly ratchet426 is wrong and provide us with the correct information, with supporting evidence if you would. 

Although I do not feel myself obliged to give anyone a detailed answer (until asked directly, in a respectful, knowledge seeking manner) I will tell you this: things do not change in the eyes of the ignorant even if coercion is the mother of all education. Maybe I make a fool of myself in the blind eyes of fools, but then again ... why should they deserve to be enlightened when all they seek is fantasy. I do however reject all forms of distasteful sarcasm.

As a sign of ultimate kindness I do give you a tip: (in such a multiplayer scenario) where is the place in which all important information is gathered and thus processed? where is the place where real decisions are made?


TimCliveroller-

Well I got to hand it to you. You managed to be a clueless, pompus @ss AND wildly entertaining at the same time! Bravo! (oh and hey, thanks for posting TWICE, genius)

So not only do you lay in with an illogical, condescending tone, when czech asks you to elaborate on your claims you just provide a non-response line of insane drivel. Oh, you don't feel "obliged" to give anyone a detailed answer. Well, then maybe you should consider not making asinine statements that you can't back up.

p.s. Thanks for the kind offer to assist with computer science "intricacies" -  but already have my Masters degree in Computer Science. How 'bout you?

 


Dear Masters degree holder, 

this will be my last post covering our short disputation (as I do not endorse topic digression). I do find some of your words quite agressive masking without a doubt signs of defensive behaviour from a mediocre knowledge base. As I wasn't very enthusiastic towards advocating basic computer science knowledge to ungrateful individuals, I came unto a few thoughtful written posts sharing the common sense perspective. I see that when confronted with hard, factual evidence - ignorance comes as the best solution serving your purpose. Again, I find people trying to disseminate this basic type of knowledge quite naive as they are faced with the same said ignorance.

As for the acandemic degree, I am completely indignant when I see such a difference in educational requirements and standards. I am completely consternated when I see people lacking in value and merit and still, they hold such degrees. This comes from an educator who is reponsible for awarding such degrees (obviously not skinny evaluated as is your case).

Quite telling that you just insult people without ever providing any argument to push the discussion forward. Basically, you're just showing everyone that, despite what you'd like us to believe by saying "OMG I'm so much more knowledgeable!!!", you never ever once provided any evidence that you have said knowledge. On the contrary, when asked to explain your stance and what you know about the subject, you go "WHA WHA WHA MOMMY!" and retreat with insults instead of explaining anything related to the topic.

If you wanted to demonstrate how you have no idea what you're talking about, you couldn't have done a better job.



ganoncrotch said:

You've not actually put forwards any of your own thoughts here Tim btw, just jabs and insults towards users for their views and intellects wrapped up in a scrabble winners cardigan.

LMAO! That is a fantasticly accurate summary of this guy (kid's?) particularly bizzare method of written "communication"