ratchet426 said:
TimCliveroller said:
czecherychestnut said:
TimCliveroller said:
Dear contributor, it is really sad to see such a misinformed opinion. I hope for the sake / sanity of computer science that you do not have any aspirations towards graduating such a discipline. Your lack of complete understanding of concepts such as latency, bandwith or deferred processing gives me a pessimistic feel about technical skills of people stating facts on conversational panoramas. Please do not base your statements on fantasy literature as this tends (in the long run) to make individuals belive in their own imaginary science.
P.S. As a teacher, mentor and guide - I am always willing to help people in positions similar to yours. Feel free to contact me whenever you have questions or you are puzzled by computer science intricacies.
|
It would be much easier to believe you if you actually highlighted why ratchet426 is wrong rather than just climbing up on your mighty pedestal and tut-tutting his supposed inferior understanding. I'm sure many people on this forum including myself would love you to share your apparent wisdom and knowledge on this topic and save us from ignorance, so please tell us why exactly ratchet426 is wrong and provide us with the correct information, with supporting evidence if you would.
|
Although I do not feel myself obliged to give anyone a detailed answer (until asked directly, in a respectful, knowledge seeking manner) I will tell you this: things do not change in the eyes of the ignorant even if coercion is the mother of all education. Maybe I make a fool of myself in the blind eyes of fools, but then again ... why should they deserve to be enlightened when all they seek is fantasy. I do however reject all forms of distasteful sarcasm.
As a sign of ultimate kindness I do give you a tip: (in such a multiplayer scenario) where is the place in which all important information is gathered and thus processed? where is the place where real decisions are made?
|
TimCliveroller-
Well I got to hand it to you. You managed to be a clueless, pompus @ss AND wildly entertaining at the same time! Bravo! (oh and hey, thanks for posting TWICE, genius)
So not only do you lay in with an illogical, condescending tone, when czech asks you to elaborate on your claims you just provide a non-response line of insane drivel. Oh, you don't feel "obliged" to give anyone a detailed answer. Well, then maybe you should consider not making asinine statements that you can't back up.
p.s. Thanks for the kind offer to assist with computer science "intricacies" - but already have my Masters degree in Computer Science. How 'bout you?
|
Dear Masters degree holder,
this will be my last post covering our short disputation (as I do not endorse topic digression). I do find some of your words quite agressive masking without a doubt signs of defensive behaviour from a mediocre knowledge base. As I wasn't very enthusiastic towards advocating basic computer science knowledge to ungrateful individuals, I came unto a few thoughtful written posts sharing the common sense perspective. I see that when confronted with hard, factual evidence - ignorance comes as the best solution serving your purpose. Again, I find people trying to disseminate this basic type of knowledge quite naive as they are faced with the same said ignorance.
As for the acandemic degree, I am completely indignant when I see such a difference in educational requirements and standards. I am completely consternated when I see people lacking in value and merit and still, they hold such degrees. This comes from an educator who is reponsible for awarding such degrees (obviously not skinny evaluated as is your case).
Moderated,
-Mr Khan
