By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - VGChartz Pro - Your thoughts (Poll: how much would you pay for personal subscription)

 

How much would you pay for a personal subscription?

$50 monthly, $400 yearly 7 9.09%
 
$40 monthly, $350 yearly 0 0%
 
$30 monthly, $300 yearly 1 1.30%
 
$25 monthly, $250 yearly 0 0%
 
$20 monthly, $200 yearly 1 1.30%
 
$10 monthly, $100 yearly 7 9.09%
 
$5 monthly, $45 yearly 15 19.48%
 
$3 monthly, $30 yearly 11 14.29%
 
$1 monthly, $10 yearly 35 45.45%
 
Total:77
carlos710 on 17 December 2013

I don't care about sales details as much as some people here do .. but if there are some nice tools and one month I'm extra curious for some reason I think i would be willing to pay up to $20 per month. Any higher than that and there would be plenty of other things I would prefer to purchase.



carlos710 - Capitán Primero: Nintendo Defense Force

"Wii are legion, for Wii are many"

Around the Network
binary solo on 17 December 2013

Seems like nickle and diming for the weekly chart to not show sales numbers for games inside the first 10 weeks after release when two clicks will give you the information.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

MANUELF on 17 December 2013
ioi said:
MANUELF said:
I still remember when it was said that VGChartz pro wouldnt change the data we get but that was simply not true, anything outside the top 30 is pro only :S


When was that said?

Let me see if I can find the quote, will edit if succesful

Edit:

Have not found the quote yet but found this thread instead http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=124174&page=1



4k1x3r on 18 December 2013
ioi said:
MANUELF said:
I still remember when it was said that VGChartz pro wouldnt change the data we get but that was simply not true, anything outside the top 30 is pro only :S


When was that said?

It was never said, it was assumed by some people who HOPED it wouldn't change.



areason on 18 December 2013

Voted for cheapest :P but i would pay 50 per year.



Around the Network
tbone51 on 18 December 2013
ioi said:
padib said:

heh, no problem. I appreciate your writing back.

I'm looking forward to the digital sales tracking and some cool new graphing tools that will spare us from using excel and worrying about refreshing old tables with revised data. ;) been there haha it's a pain.

Cheers Brent.


No worries. By the way it's Brett


Great Job With The Site! Literally 80% of my online browsing is here



Kasz216 on 18 December 2013
cmeese47 said:
I would have to say 0 the numbers have not been closely monitored enough for me to warrant paying for info that is always adjusted after a couple weeks.


That's just the nature of sales tracking.

NPD adjusts their info as well.  It's just only released to paying customers.

 

Honestly, usually trackers will have a few streams of numbers running, and only release one as the official numbers and several expiermental formulas that they think might provide more accurate numbers when compaired against official internal numbers when they are released.

Sales tracking is often  a lot like REALLY complicated Algebra



mysticwolf on 18 December 2013

I used to be a little more interested in sales numbers, which is how I found this site... but now it's not really such a big deal for me, and I don't actively pursue sales data like I used to.



 Been away for a bit, but sneaking back in.

Gaming on: PS4, PC, 3DS. Got a Switch! Mainly to play Smash