By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Why do Nintendo fans think the gaming industry will die if nintendo aint leading?

Somini said:
toot1231 said:
If Nintendo dies then gaming dies.
People will get sick of FPS and Racing games one day and they will not have anywhere to turn.

Thank you for portraying the point!

No, the point is that Nintendo fans think that.  Not 'some', 'the mayority', 'certain', no he used Nintendo fans as a generalization.



Around the Network
curl-6 said:
STRYKIE said:
the_dengle said:
STRYKIE said:
the_dengle said:

Back in the 80s, Nintendo adopted this stray industry it found wandering the streets, abused by its former owners. They cleaned it up and gave it a home, nursed it back to health. Since then, we're just a little overprotective of our baby. We can't imagine it leaving without our supervision. What if some strange men in business suits kidnap it and sell it to the highest bidder?

Mainland Europe didn't give much of a damn about Nintendo gracing their countries. Go figure.

So what 80s video game console outsold the NES in Europe?

Sega Master System and Commodore 64. Even if they didn't, my point is that Nintendo basically had a free home run on North America while there were still more than enough viable platforms in most other countries. While there were still shitty unlicensed games floating around here, the good games still outweighed the bad games, it didn't spiral out of control like it did in the U.S. to the point where it deterred people from wanting to play video games altogether. Even through the 16-bit generation, the Sega Mega Drive had a sizeable advantage in PAL territory market share (Europe, Brazil, Oceania etc.) but it was nowhere near as lopsided as the NES in North America.

All I'm saying is, people tend to exaggerate the extent to which Nintendo "saved the industry".

The Sega Master system only entered the race several years AFTER the NES showed the industry was still viable.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure we (PAL regions) got the SMS and NES the same year?



d21lewis said:
The fuck!? Who thinks this?

It "aint to every Nintendo fan. But alot of them."

C'mon man, pay attention!



ICStats said:

Touch Screen Controls: haha.  I suppose all those smart phones & tablets had no influence. 

I think Nintendo popularized the trend moreso than smart phones and tablets. The DS did come out before the original iPhone.  Of course, they did have their influence, but the DS' influence, I think, was greater.  

Of course, you're not wrong about many of the things you said.  However, I would argue that Nintendo did many things right with all of those things.  It was through the use of great implementation (especially the motion controls one).



Serious_frusting said:

The PS3 did crap at a time. 360 did crap at a time. None of their fanbases said anything about a gaming crash.

Bullshit. "The Wii is killing gaming" was all over the place at the start of last generation.

Death is an exaggeration, but I do believe that without Nintendo, or a company like them, gaming will stagnate. Why? Because other hardware manufacturers don't lead, they just do what the publishers ask them to do. And the publishers only want hardware to evolve in ways that make their job easier, distilling down to the publisher dream of the One Console, which happens to look an awful lot like a PC.

If the publishers get their way, only software innovation (where publishers add value) will be permitted, hardware innovation (where manufacturers add value) will be forbidden. And since hardware demands software, only an integrated hardware/software approach to gaming has a chance of bucking the One Console trend.

Microsoft and Sony have the resources to theoretically take an integrated approach, but Microsoft is more interested in adding value through services than hardware, and Sony simply doesn't seem to be able to integrate all its resources. Out of the big manufacturers, Nintendo simply has the best record at advancing hardware innovation in video games.



"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event."  — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.

Around the Network

Nintendo leaving the games industry would cause a massive revolution in the games industry. First of all, the huge vacuum left by Nintendo in Japan would cause their industry to shrink tremendously and force a lot of devs into the mobile market which would of course burst by the influx of new developers causing a crash in Japan. Nintendo also controls a significant portion of the rest of the world's market so the market would shrink worldwide with more focus on the Western AAAs which with their ballooning budgets are already on the path of destruction. You never want a major player leaving any industry. Other large changes would occur if any other platform holder left or even major publishers



My Hummingbird

3DS Friend Code: 047387541842

fatslob-:O said:
I'll say this, the gaming industry can live without nintendo, period.

The insutry can survive without Sony.

The industry can survive without MS.

If more than 1 leaves the market then the industry will fall, or become a horrible monopoly.



Nintendo and PC gamer

F0X said:
theprof00 said:
I think WiiU will pick up steam later on.


Half-Life 3 confirmed. For Wii U.

Well played.



Nintendo has a secret stockpile of nuclear weapons. If they ain't in the lead, nobody can be in the lead.



Can't believe some of the people I'm seeing in this thread complaining about being generalised.