hahaha

lol, say what you want

you may not be the dumbest person in the world, but you make some merits...!!!

heres your shitty iris

http://www.engineering.com/ElectronicsDesign/ElectronicsDesignArticles/ArticleID/5838/Intel-Launches-Next-Generation-of-Microprocessors.aspx

"

The Iris Pro is a system-in-package (SiP) or multi-chip module (MCM) design with the micro/graphics processor die placed next to the eDRAM chip on the pin grid array package substrate. Although manufactured as a separate integrated circuit, the eDRAM gets that moniker because the DRAM cell is built using the low power SoC version of Intel's 22 nm TriGate transistor. It is a DRAM cell with one access transistor and one storage capacitor. Although no specific material details were forthcoming, the capacitor is a typical M-I-M crown device using a high-K dielectric located above the bitlines.

"

that looks like xbox 360 edram and gpu doesnt it?

does it really loook like this to you?

i will answer your question once you answer mine, pretty much all thi time i have been answering the questions i have done for you

tell me,  how much bandwidth do you calculate for wii u edram and please the formula?

~ Mod edit ~

This user was moderated by TruckOSaurus for this post.

why are you guys even bothering replying to megafenix it's obvious he has no idea what he's talking about, its all fanboy speculation that's impossible.

I'm saying they are made differently, not that they function differently, PC has higher latency no matter what and we can offset that with high bandwidth, consoles are generally much faster at data fetching due to the way they are built (I can think of an exception or 2 but those were made pretty shitty). Texture compression will take you very far, especially on a hardware level and with a solution similar to Mega Textures or DX11.2's software/hardware solution, with all the RAM being so close together, if properly utilized, you will cap out the Wii U's GPU capabilities before running into memory speed problems if the Wii U GPU is where people are assuming it is at right now. Program codes don't take that much bandwidth or speed to run in the main RAM so that bandwidth wouldn't bottleneck execution speeds at all.

You are not much better with your Dolphin pictures.

You are the one with an agenda in here, in case you haven't noticed =)

Lol Red Dead the second got banned.

Your avatar totally matches that comment.

I wonder if we gonna have some videos and pics for this game, before he comes and ruins the thread once again with his nonsense.

I hope we do, he'll be hopping mad though after this though, I have to commend your earlier post's timing when you said people like him don't last that long here then a few posts later he's gone. That was some hilarious Doctor Who style timing there.

like if 35GB/s for wii u edram bandwidth wasnt speculation lol(even 70 or 130GB/s is still speculation)

makes no sense since that would mean only 512bits edram that even gamecube packed more than a decade ago

makes no sense since ports would be impossible, sure the xbox gpu and edram were separated by an external bus of 32gb/s, but the rops were inside the edra and had full access to the 256gb/s of bandwidth, dude, nubers dont even match

here you can confirm that, just look for the render outputs and you can clearly see that they are inside the edram, thats why they have full access to the edram bandwidth of 256gb/s, the reason why the gpu didnt have full access to the edram is due that was in a separate die and had to wait the edram+rops for their delivery, but the wii u gpu and edram are both in the same die, so obviously there is no external bus and so there is full access from gpu to edram bandwidth

xbox 360 edram+render output units(rops)

http://meseec.ce.rit.edu/551-projects/spring2012/2-4.pdf

if wii u edram was really 32GB/s then devide tht with the rops, texture units, etc, clearly makes no sense

at the very least you need 4096 bits to have soething like 282GB/s, that should prove to be enough but only for resolution

thats why 8192 bits sounds ore logical, since 563GB/s is enough for resolution, tetures, vertex data, etc

it complies with renesas arguents about wii u edra being latest technology

it matches the stateent from shinen taht wii u edra has lots of bandwidth to the point that its scary

it also makes snese sionce 10 egabytes of 256GB/s only enough for framebuffer of 720p like microsoft stated and admited that is only for that and cant be useed for textures or vertex data or anything else except resolution or mssa, etc

besides, shinen mentioned that with wii u edram you just require 7 megabytes for 720p with double buffering, yet with xbox you need the whole bunch of 10 megabytes for that, this kind of suggests that you get the same bandwidth of those 10 megabytes of edram(rops have a bandwidth of 256ggb/s with the edram since are in the sae die) with just 7 megabytes of wii u edram

i dont see 563GB/s to much or impossible, come on, even sony said that he was aiming for 1 terabyte of bandwidth using edram

here,k sony both says 1 terabyte of edram and also explains why they decided not to use edram and instead increased both the amount and bandwidth f the gddr5 

http://www.gamechup.com/ps4-sony-earlier-thought-about-slow-gddr5-edram-1088gbs/

"

PS4: Sony Earlier Thought About Slow GDDR5 + eDRAM (1088GB/s)
Read more at http://www.gamechup.com/ps4-sony-earlier-thought-about-slow-gddr5-edram-1088gbs/#rlfOyOgWDPjYPSLZ.99

Read more at http://www.gamechup.com/ps4-sony-earlier-thought-about-slow-gddr5-edram-1088gbs/#rlfOyOgWDPjYPSLZ.99

"

Sadly at this point the game has been built up so much that no matter how great it looks some people are going to be all "lol, this is what they were bragging about? So unimpressive, could be done on PS3, lololololol"