Even if Kinect had worse technology, it is mandatory and integrated with the system so it has a much greater chance of being used in a meaningful fashion.

believe me i am, if people really care about kinect, i have any problem with people choosing it over ps4.  My problem comes when microsoft make my decision easier by no offering a kinect less SKU and I'm sure there's a lot of people in the same situation as I am.  But dont get me wrong, I realized the strategy behind this.   But in terms of value, Kinect> pseye

Dear Lord, this is priceless.

Of course kinect's better resolution doesn't add at all that much, the difference in resolution for the playstation eye is barely unnoticeable. THE FIRST PARTY GAMES EVIDENCE IS OVERWHELMING..

Your comparison is like since Atari controller has a joystick it's as advance as Dualshock3... just the fact that you have to hold some kind of tracker to mimick what Kinect does tells me the Eye is not as advanced as K2. It doesn't mean it can't do things better than Kinect though. I've seen demos that show great use of the Move. I thought Sony would bundle the Move with every PS4 but they didn't and I understand why.

well played. 15 posts in and already quite a few takers. :P

not even close

You must be standing too close to the cameras. Move farther back and they should have similar performance.

You guys do realize this is a joke thread, right?

The difference isnt degligible at all: Kinect connects to X1 and PSEYE to PS4, that is a HUGE difference!

There's 120% more calculation and 50% more power to PSEye...

Not evident to know which is a joke thread when some people on this site DO believe there is virtually no difference between PSEye and K1...

So should we treat every comparison threads like a joke threads now? I do believe so though!