By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Microsoft might get away with weak hardware and still sell well because of other stuff and that makes me sad...

iamdeath said:

?? Voice can be done without kinect thats the point......................There is no compelling reason to get kinect, where are the kinect games??

Who said I was happy? Voice and facial recognition is a gimmick on BoTH systems, hate to break it to you. The vaue proposition for x1 is not there. People agree, see pre-orders.

Where did I say anything about eye versus kinect? Sony knows motion controlled gaming is a fading fad, so does nintendo..... It is just an accessory for secondary funstins and should never be forced and a main feature of a games console.

No, their is no compelling reason for YOU to get it, this is a completely subjective matter, where having these abilities is a preference for me, but apparently not for you. I prefer it as a consumer that Kinect is mandatory since it means my experience will be enriched when developers know every gamer also has Kinect. Once more, it may not be your preference, but that doesn´t lesser the value I see in it, does it?

Yes, X1 will sell in lesser amounts than PS4, just as Genesis sold in lesser amounts than SNES, yet those that owned only a Genesis were probably happier with it than the SNES. You are focusing way too much on sales as a reference for a succesful console. For me, sales has always been extremely unimportant since it doesn´t say anything about the quality of a console, just what most people prefer. Taste is subjective you know.



Around the Network
Puppyroach said:
iamdeath said:

?? Voice can be done without kinect thats the point......................There is no compelling reason to get kinect, where are the kinect games??

Who said I was happy? Voice and facial recognition is a gimmick on BoTH systems, hate to break it to you. The vaue proposition for x1 is not there. People agree, see pre-orders.

Where did I say anything about eye versus kinect? Sony knows motion controlled gaming is a fading fad, so does nintendo..... It is just an accessory for secondary funstins and should never be forced and a main feature of a games console.

 

Yes, X1 will sell in lesser amounts than PS4, just as Genesis sold in lesser amounts than SNES, yet those that owned only a Genesis were probably happier with it than the SNES.

Umm what??? Please qualify this statement.



Puppyroach said:
iamdeath said:
Puppyroach said:
I have a feeling X1 will become the actual centre of my TV experience if it does what it promises. Being able to activate your entire system through your voice, having awesome looking games and running my computer and 360 through will make so many things so much easier. MS has created something that is far more than a gaming console, but where games will be one of its driving forces.


All things the ps4 can do..............without kinect. Ps4 has vocie commands and you dont need an expensive camera.......

Wait, you mean PS4 can do this even without the PSEYE that costs 60$ and gives some basic voice commands and facial recognition? I have not heard any report that it can also activate your TV, your surround set-up and turn your console on through the sound of your voice, but maybe I have missed something. And ofcourse you can´t use the Kinect, it is not even compatible with PS4 :).


Its not weak, its doesnt need to overload the system with power to realize the move is the perfect marriage for the PS Eye so you can actually play your  games properly and not play on rails or just dance. Kinect will forever be minigames/rails until they realize they need a camera tracking device to help move the camera. It can be as powerful as it wants to be. Where Sony is truly lost is the games for it. Theres no comparing both pieces of tech when it comes to games...Kinect is definitely less able than the Eye + Move combo.



S.T.A.G.E. said:
Puppyroach said:
iamdeath said:
Puppyroach said:
I have a feeling X1 will become the actual centre of my TV experience if it does what it promises. Being able to activate your entire system through your voice, having awesome looking games and running my computer and 360 through will make so many things so much easier. MS has created something that is far more than a gaming console, but where games will be one of its driving forces.


All things the ps4 can do..............without kinect. Ps4 has vocie commands and you dont need an expensive camera.......

Wait, you mean PS4 can do this even without the PSEYE that costs 60$ and gives some basic voice commands and facial recognition? I have not heard any report that it can also activate your TV, your surround set-up and turn your console on through the sound of your voice, but maybe I have missed something. And ofcourse you can´t use the Kinect, it is not even compatible with PS4 :).


Its not weak, its doesnt need to overload the system with power to realize the move is the perfect marriage for the PS Eye so you can actually play your  games properly and not play on rails or just dance. Kinect will forever be minigames/rails until they realize they need a camera tracking device to help move the camera. It can be as powerful as it wants to be. Where Sony is truly lost is the games for it. Theres no comparing both pieces of tech when it comes to games...Kinect is definitely less able than the Eye + Move combo.

Agree woth everything you said. Sony really has not supported move with games.....

 



iamdeath said:
Puppyroach said:

Yes, X1 will sell in lesser amounts than PS4, just as Genesis sold in lesser amounts than SNES, yet those that owned only a Genesis were probably happier with it than the SNES.

Umm what??? Please qualify this statement.

What is strange about my statement?  must emphasize that english is not my first language. What I meant was that I bought a Genesis since I thought it was a better console in terms of games, while other people bought the SNES because they thought it was the better console for games. The fact that SNES sold more than Genesis doesn´t mean that the Genesis was a worse product than SNES, just that it appealed to fewer people than those that chose SNES.

This is why console pre-orders doesn´t say anything about how appreciated X1 will be for those that actually buys it, it only says that as a product, PS4 at the moment appeals to more people in general than X1 does.



Around the Network
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Puppyroach said:

Wait, you mean PS4 can do this even without the PSEYE that costs 60$ and gives some basic voice commands and facial recognition? I have not heard any report that it can also activate your TV, your surround set-up and turn your console on through the sound of your voice, but maybe I have missed something. And ofcourse you can´t use the Kinect, it is not even compatible with PS4 :).

Its not weak, its doesnt need to overload the system with power to realize the move is the perfect marriage for the PS Eye so you can actually play your  games properly and not play on rails or just dance. Kinect will forever be minigames/rails until they realize they need a camera tracking device to help move the camera. It can be as powerful as it wants to be. Where Sony is truly lost is the games for it. Theres no comparing both pieces of tech when it comes to games...Kinect is definitely less able than the Eye + Move combo.

When did I say it was weak? It is in a lot of ways another type of peripheral than Kinect and they do alot things differently from each other. Kinect is perfect for some types of games, and not others and I have gotten alot of enjoyment out of it. With the new generation I will probably use Kinect equally with games as with movies, music, navigation and as an IR blaster so we are talking about quite different products, where I prefer Kinect and other PSEYE. That doesn´t mean that one product is objectively worse than the other, does it?



Puppyroach said:
iamdeath said:
Puppyroach said:

Yes, X1 will sell in lesser amounts than PS4, just as Genesis sold in lesser amounts than SNES, yet those that owned only a Genesis were probably happier with it than the SNES.

Umm what??? Please qualify this statement.

What is strange about my statement?  must emphasize that english is not my first language. What I meant was that I bought a Genesis since I thought it was a better console in terms of games, while other people bought the SNES because they thought it was the better console for games. The fact that SNES sold more than Genesis doesn´t mean that the Genesis was a worse product than SNES, just that it appealed to fewer people than those that chose SNES.

This is why console pre-orders doesn´t say anything about how appreciated X1 will be for those that actually buys it, it only says that as a product, PS4 at the moment appeals to more people in general than X1 does.


You have NO idea iof you statement is true, it makes zero sense. I am sure anyone with An NES enoyed it at least as much as those with a genesis...



Puppyroach said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Puppyroach said:

Wait, you mean PS4 can do this even without the PSEYE that costs 60$ and gives some basic voice commands and facial recognition? I have not heard any report that it can also activate your TV, your surround set-up and turn your console on through the sound of your voice, but maybe I have missed something. And ofcourse you can´t use the Kinect, it is not even compatible with PS4 :).

Its not weak, its doesnt need to overload the system with power to realize the move is the perfect marriage for the PS Eye so you can actually play your  games properly and not play on rails or just dance. Kinect will forever be minigames/rails until they realize they need a camera tracking device to help move the camera. It can be as powerful as it wants to be. Where Sony is truly lost is the games for it. Theres no comparing both pieces of tech when it comes to games...Kinect is definitely less able than the Eye + Move combo.

When did I say it was weak? It is in a lot of ways another type of peripheral than Kinect and they do alot things differently from each other. Kinect is perfect for some types of games, and not others and I have gotten alot of enjoyment out of it. With the new generation I will probably use Kinect equally with games as with movies, music, navigation and as an IR blaster so we are talking about quite different products, where I prefer Kinect and other PSEYE. That doesn´t mean that one product is objectively worse than the other, does it?


Its the same thing as the Kinect, just less powerful yet more capable and intuitive than the Kinect in gaming. This is the very reason Sony turned down the Kinect tech. Sony could use it control media but they just wont (hopefully they surprise us but again they are leaving the choice up to you to buy it). They just want to focus on controlling games properly, yet their problem with game development outside of the main console persists.



iamdeath said:
Puppyroach said:

What is strange about my statement?  must emphasize that english is not my first language. What I meant was that I bought a Genesis since I thought it was a better console in terms of games, while other people bought the SNES because they thought it was the better console for games. The fact that SNES sold more than Genesis doesn´t mean that the Genesis was a worse product than SNES, just that it appealed to fewer people than those that chose SNES.

This is why console pre-orders doesn´t say anything about how appreciated X1 will be for those that actually buys it, it only says that as a product, PS4 at the moment appeals to more people in general than X1 does.


You have NO idea iof you statement is true, it makes zero sense. I am sure anyone with An NES enoyed it at least as much as those with a genesis...

What are you talking about? Are you just irritated about things all the time? Read my statement again, I clearly say that it is a given that people who owned a SNES obviously enjoyed it more than the Genesis, just like ut Genesis owners enjoyed our console. It is like you are working really hard just to find things to missunderstand. Calm down and we might get back on topic.



Puppyroach said:
iamdeath said:
Puppyroach said:

What is strange about my statement?  must emphasize that english is not my first language. What I meant was that I bought a Genesis since I thought it was a better console in terms of games, while other people bought the SNES because they thought it was the better console for games. The fact that SNES sold more than Genesis doesn´t mean that the Genesis was a worse product than SNES, just that it appealed to fewer people than those that chose SNES.

This is why console pre-orders doesn´t say anything about how appreciated X1 will be for those that actually buys it, it only says that as a product, PS4 at the moment appeals to more people in general than X1 does.


You have NO idea iof you statement is true, it makes zero sense. I am sure anyone with An NES enoyed it at least as much as those with a genesis...

What are you talking about? Are you just irritated about things all the time? Read my statement again, I clearly say that it is a given that people who owned a SNES obviously enjoyed it more than the Genesis, just like ut Genesis owners enjoyed our console. It is like you are working really hard just to find things to missunderstand. Calm down and we might get back on topic.

Irritated? You seem to be not mne...Again, hoe do you know people with a sega genesis enjoyed their console more then people who owned a NES???? I am waiting. That is an incredibly foolish and outlandish statement that has zero merit.