kupomogli said: Actually, Pokemon is an indie game. Most indie developers on the other hand aren't indie. The term indie comes from independant. When an "indie developer" like Klei Entertainment gets support from a third party, EA Partners, then they aren't independant. They are dependant on the funding an independant organization is offering them. The Pokemon Company on the other hand is owned by Nintendo, so being a part of Nintendo means that the Pokemon Company is Nintendo. All funding comes from within the company, meaning that they're independant. Additionally. Developers who receive crowd funding on Kickstarter aren't independant. They're dependant as most of them require the funding they receive from Kickstarter backers. Most would drop whatever project they're working on if they didn't get the backing for said project. I will use the term from time to time because people know what you're talking about when you say indie, but I hate the term because indie isn't indie. The people who came up with the term and made it popular are morons. |
The teams that make the games are independant of the big studios or independant from their corporate structures. It's not about who publishes the game. Sometimes they make deals with them to publish, sometimes they don't. Needing money doesn't make someone depended. The indies can make deals with anyone, work on any hardware. first party are not independant. If your paycheck says Nintendo on it you are hardly independant from Nintendo.
LOL at the crowd funding. Asking for money in the way they want to without even needing to make a deal with a publisher that would take a cut or require things like being exclusive is dependant? Because you say most wouldn't?
Out of curiosity what term would you come for the makers of these games?