Hell yes.

Edit: Though I'll wait for a price-cut, I don't mind waiting. No way I'm paying 500€

people bought the PS2 over the GC despite being more expensive and a lot less powerful :P

From a performance pov, it wasnt logic, but...PS2 had much much much bigger list of games so...

I will wait for the cup price too, something like 350$ without kinect. ( need Quantum Break )

I think its safe to say the cut price will come fast, thanks to the PS4 sales.

no amount of pixels, shaders, ram, or cloudzzzzzz can make that ever look good........ ugh.....

This screenshot made me thing to a gif with insane japanese :D

Who need pixels, shaders, ram or cloudzzzzz to enjoy the awesomeness of slaying zombie hordes naked?

and with smartglass.

Some Microsoft dev said something about this:

http://pixelenemy.com/insider-claims-more-xbox-one-games-to-run-at-900p-microsoft-dev-responds/

This is why Nintendo is right. Focusing on specs is fine as long as it's not going to harm the industry. The SNES was a good example of this. It was state of the art at the time and far superior to the Genesis spec wise but back then, that didn't mean you were going to cause studios to shut down and force 5 year dev cycle for AAA games. Innovation is gone because no one can afford to take a risk anymore. It's sad.

"microsoft dev" I dont really trust anything from microsoft since COD ghost dedicated servers on all platforms