By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Including Kinect With Every Xbox One Is A Smart Move By Microsoft

selnor1983 said:
phinch1 said:
Xenostar said:
selnor1983 said:
phinch1 said:
selnor1983 said:
phinch1 said:
its a good move, for micorsoft, not for me, I dont want the dam camera, if i want a xbone im being forced to buy the perhiperal.......I would never! use it so as the consumer its not giving me personally any benifit, for those who want it, yes its great

Its not a Peripheral if its part of Xbox One.

Same way Wii Nunchuck wasnt a peripheral.

Its cool if you dont want to by into Xbox One ( everyone forgets its called One because its trying to be more than a games machine ).

But Kinect 2.0 is Xbox One.

do i need that camera to play gta/call of duty? in what way does that benifit me playing those games, its doesnt, it isnt needed, its a perhiperal, if i was into games that involved a camera, or i wanted to skypre, then sure id need it and then go buy the perhiperal (optionally).....but I dont want/need it, so why do i have to purchase the console at a higer price because they want me to have it, its not a nessecity

What logic is that?

Do you need Wii Nunchuck to play or Wii U tablet to play Mass Effect 3, Batman, etc etc. If I wanted to play touch or wave gaming Id have bought it for my Wii/ Wii U seperately.

See the logic here?

A peripheral is an after thought idea which is an add on.

Xbox One is as it is. Kinect 2.0 is not an add on and not a peripheral.

Xbox One is not Xbox 360 or PS3.

If you can unplug it put it in a draw and never have to use it ever its a peripheral. 


Exactly this! it would never be used by me, therefor a waste of money

if my girlfriend decides to buy a family fun orientated game, then she can buy a camera for the ps4.

Not if you unplug your peripheral PS4 and put it in the draw. What crazy logic do you guys use to allow yourselves to prove Microsoft will do a Kinectless SKU?

Kinect 2.0 is Xbox One. Its built directly into the motherboard of Xbox One. The console part is as much of Kinect as the camera is.

Whats the matter with logic here????????????


Whats the matter with you just accepting the fact thats some people think its a terrible idea....I dont want the camera, end of



Around the Network
fatslob-:O said:
selnor1983 said:
fatslob-:O said:
We'll see what the mass will say about that with their wallets.



So far its good news for Microsoft.

400% more preorders than Xbox 360. And now unavailable till January 6th in UK. Phase 4 only available now.

The real test for both of them is post launch window plus I don't think people are going to be too happy about that price tag and what's more is that the majority will not immediately be jumping pretty soon.


Well what worries me is theres not enough Xbox's One's. Preorders are flying. 2 months after launch for none to be available is pretty worrting. If they had more maybe there would be more orders. Lots of places stopped preorders for ages due to no stock.



phinch1 said:
selnor1983 said:
phinch1 said:
Xenostar said:

If you can unplug it put it in a draw and never have to use it ever its a peripheral. 


Exactly this! it would never be used by me, therefor a waste of money

if my girlfriend decides to buy a family fun orientated game, then she can buy a camera for the ps4.

Not if you unplug your peripheral PS4 and put it in the draw. What crazy logic do you guys use to allow yourselves to prove Microsoft will do a Kinectless SKU?

Kinect 2.0 is Xbox One. Its built directly into the motherboard of Xbox One. The console part is as much of Kinect as the camera is.

Whats the matter with logic here????????????


Whats the matter with you just accepting the fact thats some people think its a terrible idea....I dont want the camera, end of

I do accept it. Thats not what this is about. Its about PS fans saying Microsoft will admit defeat and do a Kinectless Sku. Thats not going to happen. Theres 5 chips built into the GPU that are purely for Kinect. My point is, people keep saying Kinect camera can go. But that isnt all that Kinect is.

Its like talking to children.

 

User was warned for this post.

yo_john117



Kasz216 said:
Kinect is essentially this generations "Blu-ray" drive.

Sony was trying to use Blu-ray in PS3 to sort of work as a "Livingroom box" type situation, and they pretty much failed.

Kinect is the Backbone behind the Xbox one as the "All in one" living room system. Where you connect everything through it and it works great to manage all your home entertainment. Whether it's a smart move or not in my opinion depends on if it sells like a console (probably not) or sells to a lot of people for non console reasons


Not really, there are noe an extra (nearly) 80 million blu-rays in peoples home, this also helped the blu-ray vs HD-dvd war, and now other companies (micorsoft) are using the same tech, I don't see how that failed

outside of America i think its pretty much failed...as what deals for Tv do they have in the EU? in all those different countries?



selnor1983 said:
fatslob-:O said:
selnor1983 said:
fatslob-:O said:
We'll see what the mass will say about that with their wallets.



So far its good news for Microsoft.

400% more preorders than Xbox 360. And now unavailable till January 6th in UK. Phase 4 only available now.

The real test for both of them is post launch window plus I don't think people are going to be too happy about that price tag and what's more is that the majority will not immediately be jumping pretty soon.


Well what worries me is theres not enough Xbox's One's. Preorders are flying. 2 months after launch for none to be available is pretty worrting. If they had more maybe there would be more orders. Lots of places stopped preorders for ages due to no stock.

What microsoft should be more worried about is the fact that they still don't understand the mass market yet.



Around the Network
selnor1983 said:
phinch1 said:
selnor1983 said:
phinch1 said:
Xenostar said:
selnor1983 said:
phinch1 said:
selnor1983 said:
phinch1 said:
its a good move, for micorsoft, not for me, I dont want the dam camera, if i want a xbone im being forced to buy the perhiperal.......I would never! use it so as the consumer its not giving me personally any benifit, for those who want it, yes its great

Its not a Peripheral if its part of Xbox One.

Same way Wii Nunchuck wasnt a peripheral.

Its cool if you dont want to by into Xbox One ( everyone forgets its called One because its trying to be more than a games machine ).

But Kinect 2.0 is Xbox One.

do i need that camera to play gta/call of duty? in what way does that benifit me playing those games, its doesnt, it isnt needed, its a perhiperal, if i was into games that involved a camera, or i wanted to skypre, then sure id need it and then go buy the perhiperal (optionally).....but I dont want/need it, so why do i have to purchase the console at a higer price because they want me to have it, its not a nessecity

What logic is that?

Do you need Wii Nunchuck to play or Wii U tablet to play Mass Effect 3, Batman, etc etc. If I wanted to play touch or wave gaming Id have bought it for my Wii/ Wii U seperately.

See the logic here?

A peripheral is an after thought idea which is an add on.

Xbox One is as it is. Kinect 2.0 is not an add on and not a peripheral.

Xbox One is not Xbox 360 or PS3.

If you can unplug it put it in a draw and never have to use it ever its a peripheral. 


Exactly this! it would never be used by me, therefor a waste of money

if my girlfriend decides to buy a family fun orientated game, then she can buy a camera for the ps4.

Not if you unplug your peripheral PS4 and put it in the draw. What crazy logic do you guys use to allow yourselves to prove Microsoft will do a Kinectless SKU?

Kinect 2.0 is Xbox One. Its built directly into the motherboard of Xbox One. The console part is as much of Kinect as the camera is.

Whats the matter with logic here????????????


Whats the matter with you just accepting the fact thats some people think its a terrible idea....I dont want the camera, end of

I do accept it. Thats not what this is about. Its about PS fans saying Microsoft will admit defeat and do a Kinectless Sku. Thats not going to happen. Theres 5 chips built into the GPU that are purely for Kinect. My point is, people keep saying Kinect camera can go. But that isnt all that Kinect is.

Its like talking to children.


ahh right, well i havnt said that, ive just been saying i dont and will never buy it because it would be pointless to me paying extra for someting i wont use... I think the reason a lot of ps fans want a kinectless SKU is because like myself, I would get one if it didnt come with the camera



phinch1 said:


ahh right, well i havnt said that, ive just been saying i dont and will never buy it because it would be pointless to me paying extra for someting i wont use... I think the reason a lot of ps fans want a kinectless SKU is because like myself, I would get one if it didnt come with the camera


EXACTLY and its not just PS fans, drop the camera drop the price and sales will increase, the price to entry is very high for a games console. Its the only reason im waiting.

Kinectless Sku withing 24 months Guaranteed!  Probably during 2015, could be as early as Xmas 2014 if sales are not as high as they want to be. 



I like how the PS4 is the PS3.5 because it doesn't have Kinect : )

Microsoft is basically saying once you try it you'll like it. Like telling someone they'll like Frog Legs or Rat Ass Pie if they just give them a chance.

I also laugh when people say Microsoft is thinking long term because of Kinect

While I do admire Microsoft for setting themselves apart from Sony, Kinect will never be anything other then a gimmick



Subie_Greg said:

I like how the PS4 is the PS3.5 because it doesn't have Kinect : )

Microsoft is basically saying once you try it you'll like it. Like telling someone they'll like Frog Legs or Rat Ass Pie if they just give them a chance.

I also laugh when people say Microsoft is thinking long term because of Kinect

While I do admire Microsoft for setting themselves apart from Sony, Kinect will never be anything other then a gimmick


Exactly this, microsoft is thinking of the "consumer" but not the normal consumer that was from the origional xbox and 360, they just want the success that the Wii had.....and its not going to work



I would buy an XBone if it didn't have Kinect. I personally don't find the camera to be worth $100-$150 of my money.

Some might, others won't.



iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.

Currently playing:

Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)     

    

Got a retro room? Post it here!