By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - PS3 widening the gap with 360: gap is now 1 million

spurgeonryan said:
Yep. I think that after this year the 360 will nose dive. Microsoft may just can it all together to focus on the X1. Remember what happened with the Xbox? Sony seems to like glory and will keep the PS3 going for another decade.


They already said the system will get 3 more years on the market. Although i don't think it will be supported like the PS3 will. It's a trademark of Microsoft's.



Around the Network

The gap wiill be much much bigger between PS4 and One.



Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:

 PS4: 17m   XB1: 10m    WiiU: 10m   Vita: 10m

 

kowenicki said:
Turkish said:
kowenicki said:
I'm just surprised neither MS or Sony have said "we have shipped 80m!!" yet....




Yeah I think the consoles might be overtracked a little bit. I guess we have to wait on their quarterly reports which is within weeks for both.


how will that help you?


What?



Azerth said:
but which one has made the most money between the two lol


neither one lol! and definitely not the ps3. 



kowenicki said:
sub-zero-TM said:
Yeah yeah very nice congrats to ps3 for kicking ass but i'm more excited to see that nice 80m number in two weeks! ^__^


kicking ass...?

hardly.

 

I think ps3 kicked some serious ass and still kicking it! considernig how awful it started and i think it has a good chance reaching 90 or 95m lifetime maybe even 100m if we're lucky.



Around the Network

I think the PS3 can reach more than 100 millions and outsell the Wii.



g911turbo said:
Nem said:
 

Really? lol

I'm sure thats what i said. /rolleyes Maybe you need to review those E3 presentations.

I was [half] joking with you.  And bolded above.  All corps are "greedy" by gamers standards.  That includes Sony!  and Nintendo! (VC I'm looking at you)

So the joke, was, we are "taking" the games market from greedy Microsoft and giving it to... who?  Sony?  Nintendo?  Valve?  APPLE?  pick your poison dude.  These companies sell entertainment, the polar opposite of necessity, so expect to bend over.  

Want to take it back.  Your only hope is COMPETITION.  No other way around it.


You main find all greedy, but thats not exactly the case. Greedy isnt giving your customer free internet service, free games with a sub program or selling your games on disc support. Theres making a business from game entertainment and then theres doing everything you can to forcibly nickle and dime the customer. With Microsoft we got on-disc DLC, paid online, online passes, network passes, day one-DLC, etc.

No, i dont want to take anything back. The market would be better off without Microsoft. We would be great with just Sony and Nintendo.

And this comes from someone who bought both an Xbox and a X360. I regret having supported them in light of what they brought to the industry. Its a mistake i will be sure to not repeat in the future.



pezus said:
kowenicki said:
bubblegamer said:

Microsoft was claiming that the Xbox 360 would get to 10 million units first on the market and that the first console to do so would make the rest obselete. Times HAVE changed!

we could go all day with this.

psp and ps3 were going to dominate according to sony...

this is about gamers expectations, the 360 has surpassed them every bit as much, if not by far more actually.

dont make me drag out THAT thread.... or THOSE threads I should say.

Very telling that despite all that, Playstation is still ahead. Next gen should be a fun reminder of Playstation's console dominance


We will look back at this gen, in 5 years time. PS3 will come on top with 105-110 million units sold. And PS4 dominating next gen. Next gen will indeed be a fun reminder of Playstation console dominance.



CGI-Quality said:

Sony won't win this gen, even if they do pass the Wii. That time has passed. Also, I, too, wasn't talking about some interweb clash-of-partisans. Compared to the PS2, the PS3 had a bad start saleswise. The 360, in conjunction, is irrelevant, given it was miles ahead of its predecessor.

By this gen I meant the upcoming gen, should have been more specific.

I'm not sure where you're going with this PS2 talk. When people say they are surprised PS3 outsold the 360 since it had "such a bad start", why on Earth would they be comparing it to PS2? Not only are the two entirely irrelevant from one another, but again, the 360 had an even worse started compared to PS2.

Now, if PS3 were to pass PS2, then your "compared to PS2" theory would apply and make actual sense.



CGI-Quality said:

As a sequel, you should do better than your predecessor, not worse. The PS1 did good, better than the rest. The PS2 came along and did even better. The PS3 fell flat on its face until Sony decided to get their shit in gear. It's the 360 that is entirely irrelevant to the PS2, not the PS3. Microsoft had nothing to prove after the original Xbox, but Sony certainly did. What happened in the beginning of the 7th gen was a failure to capitilize on their past glory, and that is what I've meant all along. They were able to claw a sizeable lead based on their own homework and Sony's missteps. 

What we have here is a PS3 comeback because of a lot of things Sony had to do to turn things around. That's the only reason why it's worth bringing up, as I see it.

Again, what are you talking about? None is this is relevant to the post you quoted of mine. When people are saying they are surprised the PS3 outsold the 360 since it had such a "bad start" supposedly, they are not comparing it to the PS2. Why? Because the 360 did even worse than the PS2.

Did the PS3 start worse than the PS2? Yes. Did the 360 start worse than PS2? Yes. But who cares. Did the PS3 start better than the 360? Yes. That's all that matters in this discussion.