kowenicki said:
Dallinor said:
It's the last and ony piece he's written on Driveclub. Looking through the articles hes written I don't even see him mention Gamescom.
I'm surprised you would even try to defend this. Is it purely because it's what you want to hear?
|
thats that then... he cant possibly have seen it since.
I'm NOT surprised you would want to attack this. Is it purely becase it's NOT want you want to hear?
|
No you're wrong. I don't care if Driveclub has PS1 graphics and a host of technical issues if it is well documented. Accepting this article as a reasonable source of information or a "nice independent view" as you put it, when under scrutiny there appears to be some problems, however, is an issue.
The article has a flamebaiting headline from an online tabloid accused of link baiting practices in the past (first warning sign). The analysis is going against the grain (2nd warning sign taking into account the first) it's missing information (I posted the previous article for review and comparison) the article was published with a mistake in the headline (published as drivers club) then there's the possibilty, taking into account the previous work, that the analysis in the article is as skewed as the article itself.
Do you not see a problem, or question any of the above?
Beyond that, you only have to look at recent videos of Driveclub to see that there's something either amiss with other journalists take on the game and the visuals shown in the videos, or with this article. I'm going to go with the latter.