Funny how you conveniently left off the third party games for PS4 and x1 for launch, which clearly give a big advanatge to both platforms over the wii-u.A bunch of multiplats? Big third party support is HUGE in selling a system, something nintendo doesn;t have.

I didnt leave them out, I mentioned them just didnt list them and they are pretty similar. Most of the 3rd party titles for all 3 are also on PS360 and PC

http://m.ign.com/wikis/wii-u/Wii_U_Launch_Games_(US)

http://m.ign.com/wikis/playstation-4/PlayStation_4_Launch_Titles

http://m.ign.com/wikis/xbox-one/Xbox_One_Launch_Titles

Most, but not all, and that's irrelvant. Any other disclaimers you want to add to try to skew your argument? The lineups for x1 and ps4 are vastly better then wii-u at launch.

Unlike the wii-u, the ps4/x1 versions are better then their older gen counterparts.

I'm suprised people at Nintendo can afford to talk at the competition like this

Somebody should tell Reggie sour grapes aren't cool. I'm sure next Xmas Wii U will do a lot better, but all the more reason why he should stay cool.

How is it irrelevent? And please explain to me how they are vastly better. I just showed u complete lists of all 3 launces and all three are pretty meh. None of them have any title that truly sticks out as a must have title for most people. U havent given an actual argument to why there better other than saying there better.

Now over 13,000 posts on IGN! I wonder if anyone cares about his opinion?

Lose all respect no, but the whole Vita + PS3 charace that never was did in fact piss me off. PS4 + Vita is still a very likely thing, especially given that the 2 platforms were specifically developed around the same time to compliment each other (whereas PS3 and Vita were not). While I did disagree that the 3DS is a baby's toy, it's not exactly the hardcore gamer's first choice for a gaming platform either, for several reasons. The 4 eyes was just a poke of fun. They never directly insulted or put down the Wii-U. It was implied. If Ninty fans were somehow offended by it, then that sounds more like an insecurity on their part. With PS4 + Vita, it will be entirely on developers how the two interact, because Sony chooses not to bottleneck developers by forcing a peripheral down their throat, while weakening their own hardware in the process. The point of the comment was to say that Vita isn't some necessary peripheral to enjoy your console. There's actually an option there for gamers and developers alike. While I'm aware that the Wii-U gamepad isn't a forced peripheral for gamers, it is forced on developers in that they HAVE to develope their games around it, and sadly the Wii-U hardware is vitually cut in half because the system has to sacrifice a lot to keep the controller running properly.

Sony may make a lot of mistakes as a company but, so far in this new gen, they have yet to demonstrate such arrogance as M$ and Nintendo. They don't directly shoot down the competition. They simply tell the truth, and stick to their overall goal. PS3 even proved that, and it's why PS4 is on the verge of taking next gen by storm.