Damn, Killer is Dead hella bombed!! It'll be lucky if it gets to half of what No More Heroes sold lifetime. It MosDef needs a X360 port and a western release. But seeing how Anarchy Reigns did on the PS360 compared to MW that might be just fantasy at this point.
| oni-link said: Damn, Killer is Dead hella bombed!! It'll be lucky if it gets to half of what No More Heroes sold lifetime. It MosDef needs a X360 port and a western release. But seeing how Anarchy Reigns did on the PS360 compared to MW that might be just fantasy at this point. |
Pretty sure Killer is Dead has already passed No More Heroes lifetime sales in Japan.
and there was a 360 version of the game. It did ~3-4k FW.
how the hell could that disny game have outsold Pikmin 3 so fast? my happy life... wtf?
| R.I.P Mr Iwata :'( | ||
 |
|
|
interesting to see 3ds games simply dominating the charts and still some people say that 3ds games are not selling well...
| oni-link said: Damn, Killer is Dead hella bombed!! It'll be lucky if it gets to half of what No More Heroes sold lifetime. It MosDef needs a X360 port and a western release. But seeing how Anarchy Reigns did on the PS360 compared to MW that might be just fantasy at this point. |
No More Heroes allegedly sold 28k LT in Japan based on someone from NeoGAF.
After two weeks Killer is Dead has sold 23k on the PS3 and something like 3k-4k on the 360. By now it's probably already outsold NMH.
You're right that it still bombed though and I would assume the budget for Killer is Dead is probably higher than it was for No More Heroes.
| naruball said: I'm surprised you'd think that different grading system means worse students. Some weird logic right there. Anyway, in most of the universities in the UK (including Cambridge) getting a 70% in an essay is a First/an A. The very first thing me and my classmates were told when we started our masters was: "To all Americans who are used to getting 90+, forget about it. If you were a straight A, top of the class student, you should be content with a 70 here". As a tutor, the highest grade I've given was a 72 and trust me at least 20% of our students (in my department) are Americans. For a student to fail, they need to get lower than 40%. As far as I know, 100-70%=A, 60-69%=B, 50-59%=C, 40-49%=D |
All I'm hearing is that y'all demand way less over there than you should. "Should be content with a 70"? Might as well tell a gamer he should be enjoying casual games. I've never heard such gibberish in my life...
noname2200 said:
All I'm hearing is that y'all demand way less over there than you should. "Should be content with a 70"? Might as well tell a gamer he should be enjoying casual games. I've never heard such gibberish in my life... |
Dude, did you even read what I typed? A 90% in the States is a 70% here. 70 means you're near pefect here. Students who come from America expecting a 90, because they've been getting perfect scores their entire lives, get 70s if that (most brilliant students get around 68). They do the same work and some times more. The standards are simply different. Do you get it now or am I wasting my time here?
| naruball said: Dude, did you even read what I typed? A 90% in the States is a 70% here. 70 means you're near pefect here. Students who come from America expecting a 90, because they've been getting perfect scores their entire lives, get 70s if that (most brilliant students get around 68). They do the same work and some times more. The standards are simply different. Do you get it now or am I wasting my time here? |
I hear exactly what you're saying. Sorry if I'm actually seeing through the obvious lies you're spewing, though. Like anyone's going to believe someone set up a system so stupid and inefficient that 30 points are just sitting there, unused, on a 1-100 scale. Game reviewers understand how these things are supposed to work: you trying to tell me some hoighty toighty British professor's going to have trouble grasping the concept? No dude, no. I've heard the accent they use, they're clearly smarter than that.
noname2200 said:
I hear exactly what you're saying. Sorry if I'm actually seeing through the obvious lies you're spewing, though. Like anyone's going to believe someone set up a system so stupid and inefficient that 30 points are just sitting there, unused, on a 1-100 scale. Game reviewers understand how these things are supposed to work: you trying to tell me some hoighty toighty British professor's going to have trouble grasping the concept? No dude, no. I've heard the accent they use, they're clearly smarter than that. |
Cool, cool. Just wasted my time it seems. Good day to you.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
